Profile of murky depths

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 607

General Information
Last Visit Time: 29 Sep 2021, 18:14 PM


Thread: Time on target should be better for its price14 Mar 2019, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2019, 00:05 AMkingdun3284 180 munition for not reliably counter a lefh means it is totally suck. I think it is reliable the overwhelming majority of the time, though when frantically waiting for the enemy unit to appear to click the ability on it, it's possible to misclick slightly to the side, causing a shell or two to miss. If it was made to be more consistent, I think that would be fine as it wouldn't really buff it's function in any way. If all shells landed closer to the targeted point, it wouldn't suddenly become a tank or blob killer since dodging it is extremely easy. But no, it definitely doesn't "suck" -- it does it's job bretty darn well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Time on target should be better for its price13 Mar 2019, 17:31 PM Every half dozen or so times I've used it, it might end up not taking out a LefH or Pak43, but otherwise it does that job just fine. In team games I often end up spending nearly all my muni on it + major arty simply to counter LefH/PAK43s cuz it's quite effective at it. Dunno, I think it's fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: did shock troops need the buff?13 Mar 2019, 16:11 PM I think they're good but fair now (RIP grenade memes). Expensive but useful, but can still be countered very hard by LV (hello Flamer halftrack), or even outranged. And since they can't spam nades anymore, MG42 can also counter them (assuming you pay attention to it). Probably the first time I ever felt like shocks were "worth it" to make. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 7 Mar 2019, 21:20 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2019, 21:16 PMKatitof Only for infantry. In armor combat damage increments and damage values play massive role. Example: Elephant vs M5 halftruck and T70. M5 has 320 hp, T70 400. DPS as you would make it would give different time to kill, when, assuming hits, for both its the exact same time. So then what is the ideal way to calculate time-to-kill? (target_HP / (Damage * penetration_chance)) * rate_of_fire? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [TEST] Best Long Range Anti Infantry Unit7 Mar 2019, 21:18 PM Wouldn't repeatedly letting squads fight each other be literally what a real match is? The only thing it misses, IMO, is when people hit retreat -- but that varies by individual anyway. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 7 Mar 2019, 21:15 PM Doesn't DPS easily translate to Time-to-kill? Target HP / DPS = time to kill (on average), no? Assuming DPS factors in penetration chance ofc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Veto maps6 Mar 2019, 18:20 PM I think it'd be great to have a selection of vetos saved the same way you can save commanders/intel bulletins. In: Lobby
Thread: Command panther adjustment5 Mar 2019, 20:03 PM Is the Commander Panther's mark-target the same that the USF jeep gets? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Discuss for the votes1 Mar 2019, 18:01 PM Oh good, we're now at the stage that we want to remove options for people to synergize and complement one another with a specific commander, armies, and build order match up. In: Lobby
Thread: Conscript Utility27 Feb 2019, 19:08 PM I think relic just straight up goofed putting penals as a stock infantry unit. It should have been a commander call-in and instead, guards should have been mainline from tier3/4 (maybe tier-3 with the DP unlock from tier-4). As a commander call-in, penals could be made into an interesting unit with some real flavor and mechanics to back it up instead of what they are now. This would also mean that conscripts no longer have direct competition for their role and so could gain a buff (or stock tech option/upgrade) without unbalancing things. Oh well. (also, lol @ semantics) In: COH2 Balance