Profile of blvckdream

The m5 is more cost efficient than Ostheer 250.

The 76 Sherman can become broken reaching a reload speed bellow 2 secs and its veterancy needs to be looked at.

M5 is more cost efficient than Ostheer 250? What does it matter, neither get used.

76 Sherman doesnt have below 2 secs reload either. It has 2.3 - 2.52 secs vet 3 reload. Almost the same as OKW vet 5 P4 who has 2.6 - 2.79 while P4 has way better AOE, better scatter, better sight, better armor and better accuracy.

76 Sherman veterancy isnt even that good if you consider it gets neither armor buff, scatter buff, accuracy buff or AOE buff. The only good thing it has is reload speed, so what are you talking about?

Mechanized Company

I really dislike this entire doctrine to be honest. WC 51 and Mortar Ht can be decent BUT everything else basically flat out sucks and is fuel based. M5 with Assault Engineers is meh at best. 76 Sherman isn´t even a real upgrade to the regular Sherman.

0 CP - Sherman Easy 8 (because it´s a real upgrade instead of 76 Sherman)
0 CP - WC 51
2 CP - Mortar HT
4 CP - Combined Arms of Heavy Cav
8 CP - M83 Cluster Mines of Recon Support Company (needed as a option to clear out AT guns and MGs)

Breakthrough Doctrine

0 CP - Brummbär (T4 required)
0 CP - Breakthrough Tactics
2 CP - Panzerfüsiliere
2 CP - Stuka Smoke Bomb (the one from ostheer)
12 CP - Assault Artillery

The smoke bomb can be used to help breaking through enemy lines so I find it fitting. Blob officer shouldn´t be in the game that´s why he was deleted. I would put Jagdtiger into Overwatch doctrine as posted before. That´s why it gets replaced with Brummbär. OKW lacks AI tanks non-doctrinally so it would be nice to have another doctrine with a dedicated AI tank. Brummbär is also a breakthrough tank (Sturmpanzer), so it fits perfectly with the name/theme of the doctrine.

Soviet Shock Army
I absolutely hate this doctrine design. Lets have shocks and PPSHs... Lets have 120mm Mortars and Ml-20s... TOO MUCH OVERLAP. This doctrine has a lot of overlap with itself and its own abilities are fight for the same role.

2 CP: Shocks
2 CP: 120mm Mortar
2 CP: Conscript PTRS
6 CP: For Mother Russia
12 CP: IL2 Sturmovik Attack

I think the Conscript PTRS would be quite nice for this doctrine. This way the initial conscripts will not overlap with Shocks in fighting infantry. The 120 mm Mortar would be a nice mobile platform to bombard and smoke MGs to support Shocks.

Wanted to post something similar to that. Very good idea. Soviet Shock army is indeed a bad design because of the overlap.

Royal Artillery Regiment

Lacks diversity. Only offers shitty arty and flares.

- reduce Sexton price from 90 fuel to 80 fuel and pop cap from 14 to 12
- replace Permiter Overwatch with Forward Observation Post from Tactical Support Regiment. Slightly reduce munitions cost of the abilites Forward Observation Post offers.
- Valentine price from 80 fuel to 70 fuel and pop cap from 12 to 10



Tactical Support Regiment

I never see it used. I tried it myself and it sucks. Just a very weird doctrine.

- Field Recovery Operation from 450 MP for two squads to 220 MP for one squad. Why would I want to call in two engineers for 450 MP? Makes no sense. Especially because one salvage engineer squad is already enough for salvaging wrecks. If you get the chance to just call in one squad the ability might be good and useful.

- Arty Cover, used to be OP then got nerfed into the ground. Now it´s bad. Decrease price to 200 muni. To make it fair and not a complete rip-off.

- Forward Observation Post replaced with AVRE. Reason is that you don´t have enough muni to use it when u have Arty Cover and the supply drop in the doctrine. Forward Observation Post is just too munitions intensive to work in this doctrine. AVRE could do well because it gives you another option to spend your fuel and MP in late game.