Profile of blvckdream

Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 06:24 AMKiwiBirb

I play all factions. Here is how I would rank the MGs out of 10

10/10 .50 cal
Half the set up time of other MGs, instant pack up, AP rounds, ~instant suppression

8/10 Mg42
~instant suppression, AP rounds, Bad DPS

7/10 Dushka
Instant pack up, AP rounds, ~instant suppression
Small arc

6/10 Vickers
1 burst suppression, good DPS

4/10 Maxim
1 burst suppression, instant pack up, terrible DPS
Death loop

Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 11:00 AMBalanced_Gamer

I have watched replays.

One replay wont help change that.

Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2019, 10:30 AMBalanced_Gamer

How am I obsessed?

I am addressing an issue, an issue which I find very annoying since it is problematic.

You think that its alright, why not try using it every game instead.

Against Soviet T1, are you joking. It is not great against them, it is terrible. That is a shit point you have made.

Here is why. Get a M3A1 Scour Car with Penals AT on top, it kills already the FHT. Easy counter.


Another shit point you have made is T1 LT. Get a STUART which is great, m20 which can destory FHT or get zooks. Easy counter FHT.

It is not impossible, it is possible to counter FHT easily.

Stop making shitty points and actually start using it.

Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2019, 16:01 PMPanzerjager1943

I didnt even know the IS2 got 50 range at vet1. This doesnt make any sense realistically as the IS2 had to have its barrel raised every time it was reloaded, nd its optics and magnification were inferior to the King Tiger's. Both of these factors made it very ineffective at long range engagements, and very difficult to land follow up shots and properly zero the gun. It also had an abaurdly slow reload time as the shell was separated from the case. It was really only effective in short ranges where accuracy wasnt critical, and its absurdly long reload time didnt cause a huge problem since you were more likely to hit on the first shot. At longer distances it was an utterly ineffective tank and a King Tiger would outshoot it both in fire rate and accuracy in no time at all.

The IS2 makes more sense as a building buster and infantry butcher, as its large HE shells were very effective at that, but ot was nothing near a long-range Tank Destroyer that CoH seems to imply it was.

Seeing the King gain range on Vet and the IS2 lose it, maybe compensated with more effectiveness against buildings and emplacements, could be good for balance and show inspiration from the real combat effectiveness of these vehicles.