Profile of LoopDloop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3053

General Information


Thread: Bring back two man/woman soviet snipers [poll]19 May 2018, 04:21 AM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2018, 03:24 AMSturmTigerVorgo How is having 2 men team with the same range and shooting speed as WM sniper balanced? They should have range decreased or shooting rate slower or something to balance for the 2 models. Having the same range with WM sniper and having 2 models it's plainly OP. I was under the impression the wehr sniper shot faster. I’m all for getting rid of the two man squad though, there was no good reason for it in the first place. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly and Jackson are too good17 May 2018, 00:39 AM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2018, 21:22 PMShadowLinkX37 Put the ostheer panther in hulldown = God's Hammer. 62.5 range, 4 second reload. Defensive bonus damage reduction. This unit and this unit alone is probably the reason we're going to see the hulldown rework. Because the panther is starting to be reworked into a suitable state of current TDs. Only problem is teching t4 in 1v1 Why you would even build t4 when you can just spam more (somewhat nerfed) stugs is beyond me. Just make sure to keep a pfaust or some teller mines handy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wasp16 May 2018, 23:20 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2018, 23:04 PMsiddolio It's used for denying cover and garrisons. It's still got the worst flamethrower in the game on stats but as a cover denial garrison denial unit it still will and has been good. True true. Any tips on using it? I’d legitimately like to start but seems like every time I build one it gets raped. Seems much harder to keep alive than the vickers upgraded uc(I guess because of less range?) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remember when ...16 May 2018, 23:18 PM Lmao bofors suppression is so bad people forgot it exists? Or did it actually get removed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Would You Change How USF Techs?:16 May 2018, 23:12 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2018, 09:08 AMAarotron I would probably change it like this: Both captain and lt are either 50 or 60 fuel. After you have unlocked either one, the other you did not unlock fuel cost will drop down to 10 or 20 fuel. This way you do not need to spend as much resources just to get certain unit like mg and delay major too much. Of course this would need adjusting. That’s another solution I like. Usf is supposed to be a versatile jack of all trades faction (or was conceptually at the very least), so having all their damn units available to them in the first place would be along those lines. You are right that it would take a lot of adjusting though. Free lt and captain (or at the very least the second one you build) would have to be removed tho, as you would be getting them even more free at that point. Jump back to quoted post15 May 2018, 23:20 PMGI John 412 Rearranged LT tier. -Lieutenant -AT gun -Mortar -AA Halftrack. Captain Tier -Captain -50 cal -Pack Howitzer -Stuart Remove free Captain and Lieutenant units and adjust cost accordingly. Give Capt free bazookas to make him a dedicated AT support unit. Remove free BAR from LT and instead give him a total of two or three Thompson SMGs (or maybe Grease guns) in order to make him a dedicated assault unit. (Much like he is now, but less good at long range and no weapon slots) this will make the Captain and LT more specialist and less like rifle squads. LT gets frag because smoke grenade plus SMGs would be OP. Captain keeps smoke because he has zooks. Each tier gets suppression, AT, anti infantry, indirect fire and a vehicle. Neither Tier has complete domination in one area but still has tools for all areas to fit your playstyle. Major tech remains mostly unchanged except that he is now a four or five man squad that you have to purchase separately. Bigger size because you must buy separately, but higher cost. No free weapons but has two weapon slots. Basically a RE squad that has good abilities and one extra expensive Major model. I actually really like this idea. I would say that mortar should probably stay t0 for the free smoke since it is also balanced as being an inferior mortar that’s mostly to fill in t0 gaps. Also, you forgot about the poor M20 (but I’m guessing it’d be staying in lt tier). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wasp16 May 2018, 23:02 PM Is it ever going to be viable? Or did they make it better somehow before they nerfed it in the upcoming patch? Been out of the loop for a while. Also, if anyone has had legitimately good use of out of it, please let me know. I want to know how for real. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Best Wehrmacht commander against Brits?16 May 2018, 00:47 AM Not so much anything about commander choice but it seems like pwerfers would probably do a pretty good job of wrecking that strategy since they can pretty much delete at guns and Churchills aren’t great for diving things for obvious reasons. Might even work in your favor if he tried to dive with a Churchill. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Battlefield V WW2 - Reveal on May 23rd. Official.16 May 2018, 00:24 AM [sIs it WW2 confirmed?] Google search seems to say so. In: Other Games
Thread: Would You Change How USF Techs?:16 May 2018, 00:14 AM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2018, 15:13 PMblvckdream Would make sense to make AT-Gun T0 but requiring either LT or CPT to be on the field. Basically just like MG 34 for OKW. Then you could replace the AT-gun slot in CPT tier with something else. Not sure what though. That or swap the at gun and .50 cal. It makes no sense to me why you either get all the suppression and none of the anti tank or all the anti tank and no suppression. It’s not an asymmetric balance decision that promotes choice and variety, it’s a stupid balance decision that promotes usf crying. Jump back to quoted post15 May 2018, 21:35 PMShadowLinkX37 This sounds like a good idea, but you'd have ostheer and soviets with non T0 support teams. They'd either get dumpstered for 6 months cause thats how long you wait for patches, or this would probably be a no go. This didn’t seem to be a huge issue when okw was given t0 mg34 (after teching) and usf got true t0 mortar. Although I do see a bit of possible unfairness in giving usf a bunch of weapon teams buildable from t0, they have a ton of gaps in their roster already and on top of that the existing teching system sucks for the reasons above this quote. Sidenote: I agree mg34 could use more damage than a wet rag, especially if usf teching is changed like this at all. I can pretty much just leave units under fire from it while I flank with almost no consequence and it’s basically to the point where I see mg34s and lol. It’s suppression is decent and balanced tho. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW stuka balance (possibly OP)?14 May 2018, 22:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2018, 22:17 PMferwiner Why do you think werfer needs nerfs? Yes, it is lethal when used at short range. But you risk a lot doing that. Apart from katyusha, no other arty needs to do that and even the soviet one can fire in an effective manner from further than werfer. The pwerfer is also behind huge tech wall compared to other artillery. Katy and werfer seem pretty well balanced against each other and are IMO the most balanced rocket arty in the game. Werfer has a better alpha strike and suppresses but shoots less rockets total, and Katy is good in true soviet fashion because it just shoots moar rockets. In: COH2 Balance