Profile of ullumulu

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2243

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/ullumulu


Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 14:04 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2019, 14:01 PMLoren This is why you are biased. JP4 wasn't counter of heavy tanks. there are rather options; Panther. so anyway if you want, I make calculations for you. IS-2 Hit point = 1040 IS-2 Front armor = 375 IS-2 Target size penalty = 2600% Damage of JP4 = 160 number of penetrated rounds to destroy = 1040/160 = 7 JP4 Hit chance to IS-2 at maximum range = 4% * 26 = 100% JP4 reload speed = 4.3~5.2 JP4 Penetration at maximum range = 170 Penetration chance to JP4 -> IS-2 = 170/375 = 45.3% Expected Time to kill IS-2 = 4.3~5.2 / 0.453 * 7 = 66.4s~80.4s KT Hit point = 1280 KT Front armor = 375 KT Target size penalty = 2400% Damge of FF = 200 number of penetrated rounds to destroy = 1280/200 = 7 FF Hit chance to KT at maximum range = 4.4% * 24 = 100% FF reload speed = 8 FF Penetration at maximum range = 210 Penetration chance to FF -> KT = 210/375 = 56.0% Expected Time to kill KT = 8 / 0.56 * 7 = 100s JP4 can kills IS-2 faster than FF kills KT Now admit that you are biased. sorry.i mean the jackson vs kt..what we all talked about the last posts.....not the ff In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 14:02 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2019, 13:57 PMSupremeStefan U are dumb or what pls tell me what other opitons alies have espiecially nondoctrinal usf stuff hmm? Maybe sherman spam? Or as some stupid guy said bazzoka and at gun spam lol. This is more design problem. If u nerf jackson usf will be useless because they have only one gardening unit for late game. For exaple okw has jagpanzer panther kingtiger and they all good for tank battles. thats why i suggested a t95 or other options for USF. but jackson is by far the best TD you can get nondoc in this game vs armor. it trippled the effency from all other TDs. its like you can get a vet 5 lmg ober while all other can get only 2 models pios. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 13:47 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2019, 13:40 PMLoren Considering the situation where JP4 and Jackson are fighting, it's a pretty interesting calculation. The reload speeds of JP4 and Jackson are not so much different as to cause a difference in the number of rounds until one side is destroyed. So, ignore the reload speed and calculate the accuracy and penetration probability. JP4 target size: 1700% penalty JP4 armor: 230 front JP4 Accuracy: 6% / 4% Jackson target size: 2400% penalty Jackson armor: 130 front Jackson Accuracy: 5% / 3.5% Penetration ratio: JP4 -> M36 = 170/130 = 100% M36 -> JP4 = 220/230 = 95.6% Hit chance at maximum range: JP4 -> M36 = 4 * 24 = 96% M36 -> JP4 = 3.5 * 17 = 59.5% penetration chance (include hit chance) JP4 -> M36 = 96% M36 -> JP4 = 56.9% quite huge difference, uh? don't believe it? do some test in cheat mode. Having such a biased story keeps you from pretending that you are not playing any faction other than OKW. turret, fast speed, high penetration or high moving accuracy; Panther has everything you said. and now calc the stats for: - jp4 fighting at the move a IS2 - FF fighting at the move a KT And dont forget to shout the mouth after you realize jp4 is shit In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 13:35 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2019, 13:21 PMLoren but it can camo, more armor, longer front sight(45), much smaller target size. and, accuracy of jp4 is 6% near/ 4% far. JP4 more accurate than Jackson(5%/3.5%) in the most teamgames allies can blobb their tds easily: wolfpack them and a-move them....since brits and us has turret TDs..its much easier...the donet have to turn the chassie to shot into the right direction...try this with a jp4 wolfpack: the scratch into each other and block themself ..while turning the chassie they have the moving accurracy malus...means the will not have high accurys..cause of "moving". a jackson has high accurys..even on the move. the camo is nice but not that important like a turret, fast speedm, high penetration or high moving accuracy.. dont try this way... AND: ever tried to go back with a nonturret td and with a turret td? a nonturret need to drive backwards, and can- if the enemy is no dumb drive side-drive you. means he can chasse you while u drive backwards and you cant shot while doing this. or you must stop and turn the chassie into the flank. try this now vs a jackson or FF. they can drive backwards and shot on you....they dont need to stop to turn the chassie.. huge advantage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2019, 13:10 PMLoren well, TD flanking is quite hard in this game. If it's easy, Panther can slaugter all allies tanks.(but, it's hard too although it has quite good armor, speed, self-defence anti-infantry weapons, blitz-krieg skills than allies TD) Jackson has really low armor and has no anti-infantry weapons, but quite expensive. This means that more defensive use is good instead of excessive flanking. (anyway, it's historical accuate :/) Most people do not do flanking because they are not stupid, but because they are not suitable for flanking. um?? it cost the same like a jp4. and this td has no turret, no nondoc pene buff, is slower, less accuracy, lower penetration ... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 11:05 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2019, 11:01 AMAarotron It really risky to drive jackson for flanks as if your 400 mp 140 fuel tank destroyers hits mine and dies its really hefty lost to replace. ' does mines only effects allie TDS? I thought a mine sweeper would find such mines. And good players use it before drive into unknown area... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger PzKpfw VI7 Feb 2019, 10:57 AM every axis heavy is bulling hard by most allies TDs...while the are cheap, mostly with turret and high penetration. Oh..you bring out at 40min mark a KT which cost about 500 fuel to bring out...here i have a 150fuel TD...eat this. superfast jackson with high driving acc and high penetration laugh about the KT. while axis nondoc options are not 60 range and/ or non turret options which have problem on many maps and driving as pack...because the block each other and need more time to drive and turn the right way to shot on the target...while allies tds drive forwards and shot to the right side with no effort. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketenwerfer7 Feb 2019, 07:17 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2019, 23:28 PMthedarkarmadillo but there is not point in even bothering playing a numbers game to compare the 2 as they are incomparable due to costs and techs. the most they have in common is that they shoot at tanks and sometimes the zis can cloak. it would be like comparing combat engies and obers because they are both 4 man infantry squads that are at the mercy or armour. there is no point in even engaging the comparison. id lose the moving cloak, slap an extra model on the rak and try and fix its infatuation with shooting the ground. i dont think the okw need a proper AT gun (especially from the word go) when they already have so many AT options, and were even given a snare. until lategame and doc callins: what are the proper AT options for OKW? lets count: - 4model st pio with are fragil and schrecks never hit unit you come in close range (even midrange seems problem for this schreck to hit) - puma: has potencial...but has armor from paper and must stand to hit the target.. and has a slow turret for a light verhicle - pfaust on volks - a rakten which has enormous problems like we talked here > lategame: - jp4 which has so low penetration which has problem with all target above mediums - the first good AT option comes with panther... And now lets only count for ---example the brits: - Piats avialbable on ALL Squads (upgradeable) - sniper does good job vs armor - cheap AECs / cheap defense Bofors - VERY good 6pounder AT gun - early firefly which is one of the best nondoc TD (with turret, muni abilty to one shot most targets) - at nades on pios -nondoc 17pounder - churchhill since it has no problem to deal with armor..(except you kit it with a panther) since the last patch brits has mostly the best AT options...while can bring out t0 infntery which is heavy upgradeable and scale fantastic into lategame...volks are "ok"...but arent on the same lvl like this ober clones IS In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketenwerfer6 Feb 2019, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2019, 07:33 AMLoren - can camo - faster reload (almost 30% faster than ZiS) - evasion bonus 15% ZiS has delay before shot 0.125s + relosds 4.475s + after shot 1s = total 5.6s for reload. raketen has 0s + 3.8s + 0.5s = total 4.3s for reload. 5.6s/4.3s = 1.30 30% more dps means quite many thinks, don't you think? really? u calc the vet 5 stats? From rakten? you will hardly seen a vet 5 rakten in most games....cause of diying like fly in no time most fights it sees. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketenwerfer6 Feb 2019, 07:08 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2019, 04:44 AMLoren In return, Zis lost some of his AT ability. Zis has the slowest reload speed and the most expensive of all AT-guns. Also, ZiS' barrage skill is not free. and you know that? ZiS has same penetrations to Raketenwerfer. (200/190/180) If ZiS can counter heavy tanks, Raketenwerfer is also possible. well, actually do better. thats a joke, right? - rakten has less range than zis - rakten dies when u look at it - rakten set more shots into the ground - rakten has less arc when i remember right how can it be better vs heavy armor when it dies much much much faster than a zis and will mostly 1-2 shots less than the zis cause of its less range?? In: COH2 Balance