Profile of ullumulu

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2243

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/ullumulu


Thread: OKW is too oppressive towards other factions...2 Sep 2019, 06:03 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2019, 22:40 PMRiley Funny analytics from the axis fan. Rear Echelon with 2 zooks better ONLY against light vehicle, and only if it penetrate. Panzershreck penetrate all USF Tanks. But you are a fan of the axis, what to talk about with you. There is not even a guarantee that the bazooka penetrates the luchs at medium or long range. You still have to pay fuel and MP to access the racks. "espeically when there is huge cost difference" Exact, USF pays more. someone forgot to say that the schrecks have horrible accu vs mid and far targets and will misses so often. and you forgot to said that double zooks makes more dmg and and have less reload...so more dps. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track30 Aug 2019, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2019, 09:31 AMKatitof Because: -its cheaper -shoots much faster -is more accurate(much lower scatter) Because that's how it worked. It literally can not rotate when its on the move. Blame german superior engineering. But it does have smoke and that gives it superior survive ability and utility. 1. it isn't THIS cheaper that would be the reason. 2. Ah bullshit reality Argue. Then ply explain why KW2 can shot while its turret is moved..because it could only shot when turret is moved to front. and why it can move the turret faster in coh2 than a KT...which had MUCH fast turret speed. and than explain why IS shot so fast..in reality it has very low shot frequent 3. it would be better to be on par with other HT which can deal with all other LV...and don't must move and hope to run away...while other can shot on the move and maybe win the fight. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is too oppressive towards other factions...30 Aug 2019, 09:30 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2019, 09:16 AMKatitof Well, from his wording, I don't think he is aware of weapon racks. i understand this that he want to say that one schreck is better than 2 zooks. this is wrong In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track30 Aug 2019, 09:27 AM ask yourself: why has it only the half dmg from the USF ht?? why has it the disatvantage to be stationary while all other similar units can move and kit units?? it should have a advantage for this disadvantage! and dont say smoke....it has only smoke because it must be stationary. if it wouldnt has this disadvantage...it wouldnt need smoke In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is too oppressive towards other factions...30 Aug 2019, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2019, 08:56 AMKatitof That is relevant to what was said so far how again? Again...read the other posts: Riley wrote: "Even if he could buy a bazooka, like a Lieutenant, he would not become such a threat as a stormpioner with a panzershrek. Because the bazooka has a very low penetration and damage." In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW is too oppressive towards other factions...30 Aug 2019, 08:51 AM double bazookas on RE are more terrifying than one schreck on a Stpio. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion29 Aug 2019, 10:23 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 10:13 AMJilet They are already the best anti-infantry infantry in the entire game. I think they are good as they are and giving them such change will empower their godlikelyness even more then try the new ppsh-penals which are cheaper, 6 models, satchels and high dps on all ranges In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track29 Aug 2019, 09:28 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 09:10 AMKatitof Its also more expensive and arrives later. Yes, more expensive units that arrive later will perform better then cheaper units that arrive earlier if they have the same role. You've hardly discovered amerika here. Then explain bofors. It comes MUCH earlier, is MUCH more powerful to lock down areas and is even MUCH cheaper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track29 Aug 2019, 08:11 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 07:17 AMKatitof You forgot about couple and couple other you got completely wrong, so let me help you: -has high survivability due to smoke -doesn't block any other unit permanently if you go for it -is cheap -actually shoots planes down -actually got MUCH MORE DAMAGE(compared to current preview) -is mobile, so its completely immune to threats that easily destroy bofors, like mortars And if bofors is killing your mediums, you've reached level of horribly bad player that transcended stats. - has high surviveabilty? it must smoke and retreat after the first salve from a ptrs...after the sec it would be destroyed. any light vehicle has easy play vs HT. - bofors can stay there and will punisch even mediums to deal with it alone - HT is actually expansive compared to a cheap bofors - ht has much more dmg than bofors?? are u kidding? or only dumb? - mortars needs ages to detroy a bofors...in this time you can build 2 IS and do something against them - bofors can be setup in 4.min and look down every area very easy...especially in team games... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track29 Aug 2019, 06:21 AM lets compare it with a bofors (since it need to setup before can shot it works like an emplacement which is mobile): cons: - OKW ht cost more - it has MUCH less dmg - same suppression - has very low suriveabilty compared to bofors - cant fire indirect shells - cant embrace - cant deal with mediums and dont kills instant models like the bofors (which seems way to accurate) pro: - is mobile - has better AA In: COH2 Balance