Profile of William Christensen

2v2s are shit right now because of land mattress, volk blobs, calli, and emplacement cancer bullshit, oh also free rapid firing counter barrage, combined with shit maps like crossing in the woods, semosiky, and other shit 2v2 maps. Honestly if they just remove brace or remove bofors 2v2s or the game in general would be much better.

It still better than 3v3 and 4v4...

The land mattress and the calliope are needed to counter volks blobs, so I don't think those one are really sh*t. The things which are really bullsh*t and I can agree are the free counter battery (which will get nerf in the next patch) and emplacement-camping (I play Brits 2v2 and I must agree about the emplacements spam, I always go AEC since I like mobility)

You know, besides from screaming out the problems, you can try to figure out how to deal with them with things you have right now! We're all know that the game isn't in a good state as it use to be, so there is no need for another reporter.

Meh. I just leave vs Brits. I've tried, but I've literally not once had a fun game vs them. After all, its supposed to be entertaining and all.

Not all Brits players are the same, you know. Some are actually play without even heavily rely on emplacements at all. Your saying of immediately leave after seeing Brits actually kinda sad to some aggressive Brits players that just want to use the faction in a more competitive way.

Brits faction, i must admit, has many flaws which can lead to being exploited by many (Advance cancer emplacements spam). However, at the same time, they have some fun features that draw people's attention (Low in number but capable of putting up a tough fight against their enemies, good armours capable of standing toe-to-toe against some Axis armours) and some just want to use the faction fairly like other factions' play-styles (NO emplacements spam).

I mainly 2v2 as Brits and I know how tired the Axis players are when they first saw me, but i'm not like those emplacement-spamming, exploiter assh*les. I just want to have a good match where both sides just went from tired of seeing each others to see a rather fun game, one may lost but they know that was a fair win for the enemies.

Please don't abandoning us. We just want to be Brits and be fun to each others at the same time.

[UKF] Royal Air Force regiments

2CP: Designated command vehicles

2CP: Supply drops
(Drops 150 munitions or 75 fuels at the muni or fuel point respectively for the cost of 200 mp)

8CP: Air support operation (Cost: 200 muni)
(5 aircrafts will fly above the designated area: 2 will attack infantries, 2 will strafe armours and structure with rockets while 1 will either recon or drop smoke at friendly damaged armours or pinned friendly infantries)

12CP: Earthquake bomb (Cost: 225 muni)
(A grand slam bomb is dropped at a designated target (out of HQ territory) which basically the same to Stuka dive bomb but slightly higher penetration)

12CP: Air supremacy

So you were the dude that posted the Brits are cancer post, right?

Ok, I voted other because I don't even use the Bofor at all, i always go AEC.

Eventhough i must agree that the Bofors are extremely annoying to counter as Ostheer, but I don't think it is all Brits' fault that they are a bad-designed faction, it's also because Ostheer has been left abandoned for too long. Brits lack mobile non-doc arty unit which for aggressive player, building the pit is just not really fun and worth the price. Seriously, I just want a normal mortar and AEC for early AT unit, no Bofor, no pit. (Yes I mainly play 2v2 as Brits, but i don't go cancer emplacements spam)

Well, we have already faction, which totally can't into "turtle" and that makes serious problems sometimes, I mean USSSR. No defenses, no static positions, no defensive HMGs - only offensive gameplay. I don't see any real problems in making faction, which will have difficulties in offensive gameplay, but instead will have powerful defensive one. UKF really may be such faction, since they are priveleged to have emplacement-deffences.

But my problem here is - they not only priveleged to have powerful defenses, which may tear apart entire your army, but also they have powerful offensive units. Infantry squads are perfect infantry, specially with additional guns and UKF's tanks are very nice and good, so - they have no weakpoints in their design. Offensive gameplay - perfect, deffesnive - perfect, what balances all that then? High prices? Then they are not high enough.

Comet is not allie's Panther bro, it is Tiger himself, but with lower gun accuracy and damage. Just understand it - non-doctrinal spammable Tigers (mean you can make more than 1)... And Churchlis, destroyable only with PaK 43s or other heavy TDs, and Cromwells, which are cheap, but outperforming T-34-85 tanks and everything else... I wouldn't be against those units, really, but only if UKF don't have such powerful defenses. And I wouldn't have problems with "such powerful defenses" of UKF, if they don't have so cool offensive units. But, if it exist all together at once - I say no, that's ridiculous, that's faction without logic and inner mechanincs, just faction of everything at once. I don't understand then, why it is such big problem to give to USSR non-doc HMG bunkers and doctrinal BS-3 gun, if we already have accepted by community and creators faction, which combines powerful static defenses and offensive units of high quality without penalties at all!

Actually, they do have some penalties. Infantry Sections can be very good at offensive, which is true, I agree. However, just to reinforce them after an atack would immediately drain away my MP (I usually go like 2-3 5-men ISs so it bleed quite a lot) and if your ISs somehow meet ISGs spam, snipers spam or MGs spam, you are basically f*cked in terms of MP preservation.

I play Brits aggressively, I know how powerful they can be but that doesn't mean they are invincible or OP. You must understand that when you choose to play Brits aggressively, you basically throw away the benefits of those static emplacements, cause they will be an unnecessary investment (I only build 1 pit and it got like 10 kills only). You can't be both aggressive and offensive as Brits at the same time. The faction mechanics in the first place was and now still is to allow you to choose whether go aggressive or defensive, that why their units have both of this traits but you cannot take advantage of both:
_Be aggressive : MP bleed
_Be defensive : Stationary force, can't attack.

Don't see Brits exactly the same as other factions, it’s different, cause you have the option to choose and have to face the punishment if you don't follow your option correctly. Sure it seem unfair why other factions have to be aggressive only or offensive only, but that is their uniqueness.