Profile of Alphrum

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 808

General Information


Thread: Bofors19 May 2016, 16:16 PM didn't the flak truck get a price increase from 90 fuel to 120? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: company of spam18 May 2016, 13:00 PM the worst spamming is emplacement spam in team games In: COH2 Balance
Thread: (May Preview Mod) Penal Batalion11 May 2016, 11:50 AM Jump back to quoted post11 May 2016, 08:08 AMKatitof Obers are not meant nor balanced to be used WITHOUT weapon upgrade. Hardly anyone remembers why LMG is a cheap upgrade now instead of stock part. wait an non-upgraded obers cant beat an non-upgraded penal squad?!! som 1 do cheat mod In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger without claws?10 May 2016, 20:49 PM i always compare the tiger and is2 as to well asymmetrical balanced tanks, tiger having a better gun compared to is2's better Armour, but now is2's scatter is getting better improving its gun so imo tiger should get better Armour. The thing about the tiger is atm, you dont even have to flank it, it gets penned so reliably from the front (yes overtime it got sight range and pen buff but so did many allied tanks). When ever i use the tiger, its mostly in base constantly repairing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors8 May 2016, 02:05 AM as much as i hate to admit it brace in a needed feature for brit emplacements or it will be way to easy to take out emplacements. BUT the emplacements cause the most frustrating game play experience i have ever had in coh2, its far worse then anything else like volkblobs or other crap. @johnk419, stop talking out of your rear, bofors pens both p4 and panthers frontal Armour and from my experience, emplacements is far worse then OKW buildings, ISG's and motors. The only issue with these emplacements is on small maps or in team games where they just get spammed. I am not saying emplacements are OP or anything but it causes very frustrating game play experience and some solutions for the time being can be cost increases or build limits. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU 152 AP ROUNDS need pen buff?7 May 2016, 10:40 AM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2016, 09:43 AMButcher I wrote that some months before. I think the ISU-152 was notorious for using its HE shells versus vehicles. Believe it or not: The AP shells could bounce off, the HE shells would however devastate the target. Give it an increased reload time but let it fire its HE shells effectively against vehicles and infantry alike. Maybe an "AVRE/ Sturmtiger light" approach would fit the vehicle, where you fire a devastating shell every 20 seconds. what would be the point of uidng AP shells then lol. Me personally i would be happy if its AT improved but at the cost of losing some of its AI. It currently can wipe squads in 1 shot and then by buffing its AT its going to counter tanks too. IMO it should either excel in either AI, AT or have its AT buffed and AI nerfed a little to make it good at both but not excel in them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic: Week 1 Update to the Balance Mod6 May 2016, 01:07 AM lol ppl cried cuz shreks on volks allowed them to blob....now its on sturms which is by far much harder to blob and people still cry. Sturms will find it difficult to do their job as AT compared to volks because ther guna be busy building mines and repairing throughout the game In: Lobby
Thread: Tommies need a damage nerf4 May 2016, 22:38 PM lol they are mostly fine.....only thing that MAYBE needs looking at is the double brens but other then that their fine for ther cost In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors2 May 2016, 21:42 PM if anything it should at least have a price increase? i think it currently costs 280 MP/30 fuel? (correct me if im wrong) and is way to cost efficient for what it does. By the time you waste so much manpower, munitions and fuel to take it out another one comes up instantly too lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Panzerjäger Doctrine [New Commander Idea]2 May 2016, 01:45 AM what about the panzerbüchse 39's purchasable on volks instead of sturms? In: COH2 Gameplay