Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Sections need their out of cover stats reverted26 Apr 2019, 19:56 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 19:09 PMelchino7 TBH, this is what makes them feel "clunky" to use and not good sniper counters in both cases. The Kubel has very low DPS on the move and that it what make it bad at chasing snipers. Regardless how good these unit are vs sniper, the point I was making thou was the WC DPS is not low as it was claimed. On the contrary it on of the highest. The M3 on the other hand has very high DPS even on the move. Finally the penetration of these weapons could be reduced so that kubel does not die so fast. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sections need their out of cover stats reverted26 Apr 2019, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 18:19 PMelchino7 Do you know the arc of each MG? 30 degrees for bren with Horizontal speed 65 60 for kubel with Horizontal speed 24 on the other hand the rotation is 40 for kubel and 60 for WC In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sections need their out of cover stats reverted26 Apr 2019, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 15:39 PMSeductiveCardbordBox Brit squads are more expensive and have huge moving accuracy penalties. The bren carrier is also turretles, sort of slow and doesn't do all that much damage. The brits are more vulnerable to early snipers and that weakness is explicitly why bolster is available early. Bonus points: they also have no mortar and no halfrack, both helpful when handling sniper play. They also have to tech to get an engineer squad so they don't even have a cheap capping unit. That information is false: Bren carrier has one of the highest far DPS. It is actually 163% more DPS then kubel and remain superior to kubel up to range 19. And that is without the bren upgrade. In addition it acceleration and rotation are superior to kubel and only its top speed is lower. As for the turret M3 does not have, Kubel does not have and WC51 does not have one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 13:06 PM Increasing DPS to solve diversity issues is step in the wrong direction. Penal had their DPS increased to be used more often and it lead to chain reaction increasing the DPs of Guards, then shock and now Conscripts. After so many patches I would expect that it ha become clear, that when balancing a number of small changes if more effective than major buffs. In the end of the day if units with in a faction are "compared" on basis of DPS one will always better than the others. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 12:21 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 12:17 PMLago He means 0.4 as +40%, which is roughly correct. Not really, the original post talk about DPS and not %: "Not really. Their DPS improvement over con mosins is minimal. ~0.4 DPS at all ranges. You really believe an "improvement" of 1.2 DPS would make a difference?" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 11:00 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 10:03 AMKatitof Not really. Their DPS improvement over con mosins is minimal. ~0.4 DPS at all ranges. You really believe an "improvement" of 1.2 DPS would make a difference? That info is simply false (once more I might add): DPS Guard's mosin 0/10/20/35 4.734/3.659/2.569/1.423 DPS Conscript's Mosin 3.614/2.603/1.984/1.06 Source cruzz. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 10:53 AM The Guard's Mosin is extremely good on the move and Conscript with it would be OP on the move. If this weapon is moved to Conscripts the moving accuracy needs to go down. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 09:15 AMSeductiveCardbordBox I know it is hard to believe because the maxim is bad, but T2 builds do exist. What, are soviets supposed to just not have any mainline unless they pick T1? Penals were never supposed to be that but cons have been so bad for so long that the only way to make T1 viable was to let Penals stand on their own and give them AT. The latter is still needed to keep T1 from getting roflstomped by light vehicle play, but penals still lack any identity as an assault/demolitions squad. That is simply false. Penal could stand on their just fine before they where buffed. And no conscript are not that either, they are simply not cost efficient vs ST44 VGs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 08:44 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2019, 08:40 AMKatitof If they are not going to win fights, then they are redundant squad that nobody will use. Look at grens. They are supposed to be always be used in combined arms way, because that's how the faction is intended to be used, yet they are perfectly capable of winning engagements on their own. If that doesn't get to you, feel free to drop the discussion as you clearly are incapable of seeing the problem and the reason why the changes are happening. I see that once more you are trying to challenge me to an intellectual duel but I don't dual with unarmed men. Have a nice day BB (PS suggestion: load and play the game before making balance suggestions.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet General Faction Changes - New cmdr mod 5.026 Apr 2019, 08:38 AM Conscript already vet faster and bleed less with the upgrade they do not need to actually win firefights. Causing more bleed is enough. Test giving them "hit the dirt" with upgrade, that will further reduce their bleed. Imo it high time we stop increase the DPS of every unit out there. In: COH2 Balance