Profile of Grim

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1096

General Information


Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins19 Oct 2016, 09:48 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2016, 21:57 PMFalseAlarm Andthe AEC shouldn't damage inf to begin with. because? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A Simple Question about Panzerschreck19 Oct 2016, 09:46 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2016, 22:01 PMSturmAlpha really? r u new? Why? Because I don't want to see a return to shrek blobs? Anything which promotes combined arms is good for the game in my opinion. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Artillery18 Oct 2016, 13:35 PM I think static arty shouldn't be lumped with the mobile versions. Why? Because the moment you fire that first barrage your on the countdown to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZZ504TGDpE In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okw need call in tank busters.18 Oct 2016, 13:30 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2016, 12:04 PMullumulu why they didnt nerf the schreck? problems solved. Copy the stats drom zooks...and all is ok....but....oh wait..USF/UKF can carry 2 zooks/piats... the galliope and the ukf werfer are the most powerfull indirect arty in game. its wipes everytime 2-3 squads (mgs/ AT/ and retreat units) Yes. Well done. Your powers of observation are unmatched on the field. USF/UKF can carry two weapons. In regards to LMG's this can lead to them overperforming slightly (also depends on vet etc etc) But you essentially need 2 zooks to match one shrek anyway so its a moot point. Calliope and Land mattress (I'm sure you play them extensively and only used a axis name by mistake) are both doctrinal. Calliope has been nerfed multiple times and is the most expensive rocket artillery. Land mattress has short range, enormous scatter, slow speed and can me captured by the enemy/easily countered by your own rocket arty. All rocket arty can wipe 2-3 squads in a barrage. The idea is generally to move your units or not blob them if you are facing a known user of said units. If you lose 2-3 units EVERY time the enemy fires......then I think the fault may be with your approach to the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okw need call in tank busters.18 Oct 2016, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2016, 07:28 AMullumulu Hm. ok. Schrecks on okw is op. piats/ zooks / are ok on usf/ukf? Why? USF and UKF have one of the most potent anti tank hunters tanks in game... they get the most potent infantery too...the most potent indirect fire too the get one of the best heavy tanks too.. @ relic: pls push the allies more..they dont get enough nice stuff yet...pls make them more OP... Shreks are superior in terms of performance. This has been discussed at length in numerous threads. Piats and Bazookas have their own advantages but in terms of performance the shrek is the best. USF have the best infantry that can't be denied, once the mortar gets the nerf it needs this will be balanced out hopefully. In terms of indirect fire? I'd say the axis take this one simply because they have everything non doctrinal. One of the best heavy tanks? I should hope so, seeing as there are 3 allied factions I would hope they have at least one good heavy tank between them...... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins18 Oct 2016, 10:31 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2016, 21:08 PMFalseAlarm By raising their cost, you are making sure that no one ever builds them anymore and instead go for medium spam. A more sensible solution is reducing their damage by half. and why the hell would I ever build one then? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins17 Oct 2016, 13:27 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2016, 13:07 PMrobertmikael I agree with this. It is better to tie call-ins vehicles and tanks to buildings than to tie them to CPs, because then you can't skip the buildings. For example tier 3 building for Stug-E and tier 4 building for Tiger, and major for Calliope and Pershing. Maybe tier 2 building for Ostheer Puma and captain for M10. I also think that Hectors idea is good, that is, nerfing light vehicles by increasing the MP cost for each light vehicle. Would also like to see Light Vehicles get a price nerf when a faction has fully teched, so they may still be of some use in the late game for scouting, laying mines, reinforcing etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins17 Oct 2016, 11:47 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2016, 11:24 AMRiCE I think CP requirement should be the right tool for limiting the medium call ins. I would get rid of 0CP T34/85 for sure. Its obviously a bad design.. If someone has the fuel to unlock T4 and build a T34/85 why shouldn't they? If they do it early that means they've skipped all other fuel investments. If the enemy does not take advantage of that then it makes no difference when the 85 comes as the game is already won:/ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A Simple Question about Panzerschreck16 Oct 2016, 08:50 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2016, 19:43 PMSturmAlpha isn't Panzerschreck supposed to counter Allies Tanks and all kind of vehicles with ease Like Volks before the balance and Panzergrenadiers? I Think it should be handled to another elite unit that can easily fight against tanks That's exactly what it should not be doing. AT guns, Tank destroyers etc have that role. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allied infantry vs Axis tanks6 Oct 2016, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Oct 2016, 17:51 PMPanzerGeneralForever someone hasnt played axis in a long time... Rocket artillery makes sure axis dont even have men at all Rocket artillery? USSR: Non-doctrinal UKF: Doctrinal USF: Doctrinal OKW: Non-doctrinal Wher: Non-doctrinal Just an observation. In: COH2 Balance