Profile of Grim

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1096

General Information


Thread: High Skill USF gameplay is just so micro intensive8 Apr 2020, 09:31 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2020, 09:25 AMblvckdream Almost like blobbing all your units into one blob is not enough for USF anymore. They now need to blob all units of all palyers on the team into one blob. Then 20 minutes later they surrendered after complaining about Stuka. So both players blobbed their units then you countered it with a stuka? Why does this warrant a thread? In: Lobby
Thread: (H)MG34 8 Apr 2020, 09:27 AM I'd be happy to swap the stats of the Maxim and MG34 and call it a day. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: High Skill USF gameplay is just so micro intensive8 Apr 2020, 09:23 AM It looks like you are getting pushed by two players blobbing. Yet you have an Ost ally with access to the MG42? Strategic masterminds at work indeed. In: Lobby
Thread: The mod team's balance patch to Tommy was wrong6 Apr 2020, 23:55 PM I think most, other than the obvious candidates on this forum, agree that the UKF are the weakest out of the current factions. However, Tommies are a tricky one to balance. Personally I'd just ditch the cover mechanic and tweak it from there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Company5 Apr 2020, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2020, 15:28 PMSkysTheLimit I think that was an ardennes assault feature in the campaign Ah must have been getting my wires crossed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Company5 Apr 2020, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2020, 17:19 PMT.R. Stormjäger Except mine is relevant and yours isn’t. You don’t see Conscript wielding Fantasy weapons or a T34/76 needing 7 Tigers to die. There is a degree of fidelity to historical accuracy which extends to units and their roles on the battlefield. Historically pathfinders did not have mine laying roles or equipment, those belonged to airbourne engineers which were attached to airbourne infantry divisions. Equating battlefield roles to combat realism is a baseless comparison. I've seen 'realism' as the basis for countless arguments regarding CoH2. Never ends well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Company5 Apr 2020, 11:43 AM Was I imagining it or was there a bulletin that let pathfinders infiltrate from buildings? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sweepers in half track's shouldn't detect mines.4 Apr 2020, 08:49 AM Tbh if someone has the foresight to put a sweeper unit in their HT to support a push then they deserve to benefit from it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What if we made the Flame Hetzer a useful unit? 3 Apr 2020, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2020, 14:17 PMFarlion Here we go again. We can't have nice things because of 3v3 and 4v4. I don't care about 1v1. It bores me to tears. Team games are what CoH2 is about for me. If the balance is ruined for 1v1 then I apologise to the 10 people that may upset. 1v1 orientated balance isn't the way to go if more people are playing team games. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What if we made the Flame Hetzer a useful unit? 3 Apr 2020, 14:13 PM Happy to give the hetzer a buff if it leads people away from using Grand Offensive and fortifications 24/7.....shit's getting old. In: COH2 Balance