Profile of WireInEye

I wonder why Lelic decide put into game a conversion (approx 20 vehicles was converted) instead of succesfull "original" TD version approx 2800 vehicles was build minus command versions & recovery vehicles & conversions like flampnazers/flakpanzers/etc.

Oh I know all about new doctrine with flame weapons They should make some new animations like SPios playing with matches ....

Hi,

I just saw some game replay on propagandacast channel where shocks stand infront of 251 HT and they was able to cut like 40% (by smgs) of halftrack HP before forced to retreat.

Now I playd a match against US and i got stupid idea to cap part of map, place sniper infront of MG and chase flanking rifles with Flame-HT. This lead to multiple ATnades multiple repairs and over was 2 nades and M20 car which shred HT to pieces.

Why 251 HT have same armor like 222 which can be penetrated by small arms (even 250 HT have higher armor and it is same as 251 HT just short version)?

Flame 251 need to get closer than quad M-5 why it have 9 front 4,5 rear armor compare to 28 front 20 rear?

Yes you can say 251 is from T2 and M-5 T3 and M-5 cost is higher by 70MP .

Give no sense to use 251 when this vehicle can get 2 AT nades and get finished by small arms (222 at least can shoot from distance and escape if pathfinding deamon is in good mood).

My suggestion is increase armor of 251HT to 11 front and 5,5 rear (level of OKW Flak-HT, 250HT and M-20 utiliti car).

PS.: Replace 222 with puma COH1/online style.

PPS.: I will be glad for your opinion

PPPS.: L2P message is not opinion