Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: Let's speak about OST AT mine27 Nov 2018, 21:34 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 21:26 PMSkysTheLimit It should, because the old demo required vision for you to get the wipe (or a hell of a lot of luck).... Yes it took real luck and or vision to know that when that point begun decapping, there was a unit there ready to be blown up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For balance Axis really needs demo or satchel. 24 Nov 2018, 02:14 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2018, 07:47 AMLoopDloop What part of “can withstand small arms” was missed there? It gets penned by small arms 100% more than the bunker and okw trucks do (actually 100% more than 0 is still 0 so that’s not even technically true but you get the point I hope). Fighting pits withstand small arms to a large degree, armour or no. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For balance Axis really needs demo or satchel. 23 Nov 2018, 04:56 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2018, 03:00 AMMakiesKurisu Allies demo and satchel are usually used to destroy bunkers and OKW FHQ. So, give Allies bunkers that could stand small arm fires and FHQ? Like the USF fighting Pit? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: t70 recon nerfs21 Nov 2018, 20:54 PM Spotting scopes don't come stock on German vehicles as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For balance Axis really needs demo or satchel. 21 Nov 2018, 19:14 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2018, 17:05 PMzerocoh The real question is: WHY YOU WANT TO DESTROY HOUSES AS AXIS?! Houses favors axis so much more than allies, most houses have only 4 windows at best meaning that the 6 and 5 man squads of allies are always firing with less power and the superior axis grenades make garrisons so dangerous for allies. As axis you want to keep garrisons the longer you can. Because building orientation and usefulness is asymmetrical in some maps. Buildings are capable of benefiting one side more than the other. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: about small arm and relative positioning. 15 Nov 2018, 16:28 PM I don't see how making relative positioning is fufilling any objective as no matter what the tactical decisions will be one side will be best staying still and the other will be best at moving forward. In: Lobby
Thread: Is2 and other heavy tanks issu13 Nov 2018, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 20:28 PMcochosgo Hell, even a Stug can force the IS2 out of position. It feels like everything penetrates it way to consistenly, so you basicly have a experience soaked sponge for your enemy AT and armor to squeeze. Good thing we don't base balance on your "feels" The is2 has the same armour as the KT and doesn't face high range high pen TDs ( discounting the KT and ele) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M2 HMG .50 Cal31 Oct 2018, 05:06 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2018, 03:35 AMCODGUY Considering how much babysitting of USF units you have to do just to keep them alive it is a downside, especially since the HE isn't even that good. It's so inconsistent half the time it barely does any damage. What numerical stat makes it bad/not good? You dont get to say the word "inconsistent" as its just biased opinion. Its like saying the Stuka is bad and inconsistent because every once and awhile it misses. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: insta kill mines30 Oct 2018, 21:04 PM Because they cost more and ost doesn't get general purpose mines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF radical design changes ideas27 Oct 2018, 01:09 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2018, 00:55 AMLoopDloop Thanks for the stats. Good to know. The last line throws me for a bit though - it says that 2xstgs are better than the 1 BAR at ranges below 30 but then there's this line: Point Blank: Rifles and 1 BAR: 6.79x4+13.2= 40.36 Volks with StGs: 4.74x3+7.52x2= 29.26 Did I miss something? It depends what he means, if he is comparing two entities with STGs vs 1 bar, of course the two does more damage than the one. But all things being equal, the DPS of two stgs should be compared to 1 bar and 1 garand. In: COH2 Gameplay