Bruh it's ok, you don't need to write a full essay in full defense mode here just because you got accused of being a biased axis main, it was not that serious. I'd suggest getting slightly thicker skin though. Btw "we" in that case would be people who have experience with axis mains. Almost every time profile pictures and/or names about german generals or soldiers, and always the same looking playercards
So if i am a axisfanboy ... where is the 2on2 stats with "sabersakura" and easly over 270/40 W/L as allies
Good question, where is it? Nowhere to be found on the stats page I linked, and it tracks games from up to 10 years ago. And the numbers don't lie
And now I remember who you are, you're the guy who claimed sapper mega-blob into Churchill spam (and nothing else, just 2 different units) was a broken overpowered strat in CoH3, then ran away as soon as I respectfully asked you to demonstrate the OPness of the strat against me In fact I could swear you were whining about "allies OP" almost every week even when coh3stats showed axis have higher winrate in teamgames. And for some insane reason axis queue times were ~10 minutes and allies queue times were ~30 seconds
That's just more hints pointing to you being a biased axis main, I'm sorry
And now you're an axis main again in CoH3 . Why not just admit you're biased rather than writing an essay even when TWO playercards prove otherwise. It's not a crime or wrong to be an axis or allies main and being biased, I just don't get arguing about it after getting called out when even hardcore proof like playercards shows a different picture