Profile of aerafield

Who is faking ranks???

I am top 5 and I can take on any player in a teamgame mode, I can assure you that. Do I always win? No ofc not, I get outplayed too at times.


You are top 50 and you can't take on the most basic players. Just yesterday you ragequit after 10 minutes because I pushed back your blob 1 time even though your team had half of the map, and today you got owned by a mediocre wehr player even though you had the 2v1 advantage most of the times. See the difference?

And I'm done arguing for now, feels like Im standing in front of a white wall and a person wants to argue about the color of the wall, saying it's not white at all.

You Mr.Rank#1, when are you going to show people your pro plays in a tournament?

Like this?

•  
  

  1

  VS

  [NS] aerafield [NS] YGNOW [NS] Brickman

  coL HelpingHans VonIvan SturmTigerGaddafi

  NS vs HelpingVonLuvMan R2G2

  by: aerafield map: Unknown

  1

  -

Though I dont know why someone would need to participate & flex in tournaments in order to be a good player???

I just put these 2 pictures here, should explain everything







This is what annoys me the most about random teamgames. These insanely boosted <50% winrate players just as yourself who are "top 50" even though they play like rank 1,000 with the exact same build order and strategy every single game no matter what map or enemy faction. I know so many people who think you are a god-awful player, to a point where they instantly leave the match as soon as they see your name in their team.

Heck I don't mind if someone is low ranked, it's not his fault that the matchmaker gave me him as teammate. But it's stupid that horrendous players can rank up simply by spamming enough games and then they get manhandled by much lower ranked opponents.

And yes it's indeed absolutely mindblowing that I was able to tank 2 entire OKW players for 50 minutes while you and the other brit were brainAFK for the entire game vs one wehrmacht player, I mean just look at the wehr K/D & damage. It would have made 0 difference if I went middle with teammates as this, they would have just flanked me from my side with 6 panthers while you guys do nothing

http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198084516650

http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198159844807

Is this similar to the issue that Minsk Pocket has for many players? Where each side has to travel the entirety of the long side of the map to reach the VPs?

Yes exactly. Minsk is like Poltawa basically with the same issues, just the paths are longer.

Imo Minsk would be fixed so easily by swapping the locations of the far VPs and the ammo sectors Should be <5 minute job

The best i can think of is allow M5 to drop bazooka and bar free tech

5men sections with double BARs.. exactly what this game needs atm

As of now, the Lend Lease Assault Regiment is designed poorly and underperforming compared to the other British commanders, as you can hear from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGz69fe4Wng.

Wow what a representative tier list, the complete meme commander "Advanced Emplacement Regiment" ranked above land mattress and lend lease And it's also from 1 year ago when the assault section was not even a call-in yet...


Also, no to all of these suggestions. I see this commander a fair amount of time and it's probably one of the best 1v1 commanders next to Royal Arty. Not to mention that your 75mm HT suggestion won't ever work as it's impossible to implement completely new units to the game.