Profile of Kozokus

there's already existing "regional localizations" in the game (eg. changing the language option from english to german or russian via steam if u get what im trying to say). all relic needs to do is do a little programming and boom! u got native language option in the game.

There is ger as well as ru version of the game, there is obviously US/UK version. All with their own voice acting, so that is already done.

Still would likely require building new client, which is a considerable effort, more then ctrl+c ctrl+v.

Ah my i completly forgot. You are right. (both)
About programming their code is already rigid enough to prevent us from rejoining a game you just disconnected from so i doubt that will be a feature.

Kozo.

so you prefer that the axis and soviet units are speaking in corny english? at least USF and brit voices sound convincing better than those other 3 factions i spoke of. ugh hearing axis and soviet dialogue in english is nauseating.

It takes a lot of time, a lot of money, a recording studio, a lot of people, castings.
For no particular added value to the game.
Yet, it also needs an option to turn it out as a lot of people want to understand what the voices says. Too much effort.

Kozo.

Hello



Noway!

More abandoned tank mechanic? that one thing everybody want to go out? That thing even the dev try to minimise more and more?

There is nothing to add to what other said.

Kozo.

Hello.

From what i remember, there where huge balance issues in DOW1. Remember that time where a squad of greyknight with a chapelin forced in distance mode was almost impossible to beat? Or the necron warriors that could outshoot a tau army and chop khorne berzerkers at the same time?
I think what changed was the fact that the game was more FUN™, cartoonier, there where no trackable ladder, and the game focused more on the campaign than on the multiplayer. There where also less people on the forums, less toxic behaviour and more polite words.

I heard one time a developper (i cant remember the game) that said that they where glad to see toxic player playing their game and polluting their forums. Because that meaned their game was alive, attracted a lot of people and had a vivid competitive aspect.

Maybe that mean that if you make a game full of gentlemens you made a very good game, but if you made a game full of jackass you made a sucessful game$$.

Kozo.

Hello.

Massing snipers is a valid tactic in 3v3 4v4 as you abandon your field presence to give one of your ally a powerful (but fragile) support force. very map dependant and tend to be countered by the mortars that flourish during thoses games.

In 1v1 an unanswerd sniper bleed a guy every 6 second.
His role is to force one of the four folowing answers:
- The ennemy move forward with 2+ squads and hope for some lucky bullets to end the sniper's life. Knowing this you can position to welcome his vengeful charge.
- The ennemy build a mortar or two and hope for some lucky shot. A mortar is of more debatable use in 1v1 against someone that does not use teamweapon. If you are mobile he made a unit that will not help him.
- The ennemy unleash the wrath of a sniper-hunter specialised unit in the form of a kubel/Halftrack/M20 that do get a bonus for shooting at a sniper. Once again if you can predict such a behaviour you can quickly score a vehicle kill in your favor.
- The ennemy will hide behind a building or retreat a little and gather all his forces, forcing the sniper either to put himself into a dangerous zone or beeing an expensive spotter with nothing to shoot at. Then, with all the ennemy forces at the same spot, the sniper is far less effective and protected. Things will then move to answer 1.

The best snipers are not lonewolfs.

Kozo.

Ps :If this is a british sniper, just hide into a building oh wait. was it fixed?