Profile of wouren

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

General Information
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjzo7fDOd0qKeGcu2Ub9kDA


Thread: All light vehicles have 400 hitpoints expect the T7019 Jun 2016, 21:31 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2016, 21:00 PMPencilBatRation What would you say about the other similar vehicles which can survive more than to hard AT shots and have the exact same AI potential? Are they as beautiful? Give me an example and I will tell you why you are wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: All light vehicles have 400 hitpoints expect the T7019 Jun 2016, 20:56 PM Fails to deliver? It kills almost every shot. I think it is great and the repair ability allows it to escape but still punishes you with a munitions sink. Rewards preservation with a late game sight ability. Beautiful design IMO. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Germans much easier to play as Allies/Usf/Soviets16 Jun 2016, 00:39 AM Both weapons are situational. When it comes to synergy, a Zis works better than the 6pdr because its an assault gun. Together with a Maxim, it becomes anti everything, AND comes from the same building. I'm not saying it isn't balanced. I'm saying for its price, it is objectively worse. I don't think that is a problem due to the fact it can come very early and is complemented with AT nades to protect the weapon from flanks. Also, I double checked to see if I was just misunderstood, and an assault gun is actually supposed to refer to weapons mounted on vehicles. The 60 muni barrage can help you in a pinch, but it does not compensate for the lack of penetration. Takeaway: 1. It's balanced correctly and I would not change a thing. 2. It's worse than the 6pdr, despite its barrage ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Germans much easier to play as Allies/Usf/Soviets15 Jun 2016, 15:29 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2016, 12:34 PMButcher What? I´m always glad if I see Soviet opponents on the loading screen. Seeing Brits on the loading screen makes me feel frustrated and prepared for an unfun game. Brits are by far stronger than poor Soviets. Vickers > Maxim Tommies > Conscripts Cromwells > T-34/76s Comets > doctrinal T-34/85s To only mention a few important units. Add to that the worst vet bonuses in the game coming for Soviet units and some of the most gimmicky abilities and vet bonuses coming for the Brits (grenade on tanks, Phosphorus rounds, tank commander, Blitz without vet) and Soviets are the clear loser. That is literally a solid line of more expensive item > less expensive item. A point that you could make is that 6pdr > ZIS but other than that I can't think of anything substantial that isn't compensated for. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new victory strikes11 Jun 2016, 04:03 AM The Russian allied supply drop can be used in allied bases, but it can - as many do not know - be used in enemy bases. I take great pleasure in using that supply drop as a substitute for a victory strike. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: "F- word" issues10 Jun 2016, 17:49 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2016, 17:15 PMsiuking666 And that flower thinks she is pudding funny. a 18+ rated game forbids cursing. good god. dat logic. 1. That's just rude 2. it would be 'puddinging' not 'pudding' In: Lobby
Thread: Official Imperial Dane Drinking Game10 Jun 2016, 17:44 PM Deleted everything I typed after I realized that he is a site member. We love you dane! In: Scrap Yard
Thread: "F- word" issues10 Jun 2016, 14:19 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2016, 12:22 PMalfik W-what? The fact that this thread is here and there are opinions from both sides IS proof that this is an issue. A "mod" who comes and says "it's not a problem because I said so" doesn't make it any less of an issue. You then proceed to defend said mod and tell me to flesh out my argument (lol), while I've already made several posts explaining why I think obligatory profanity filtering is a bad idea. And don't even get me started on that "free speech" thing. If you're not insterested in an argument regarding profanity filters, why do you even bother replying to my posts? Just to call me an asshole for having a different opinion? What does that make YOU? Also, your little cute counting is irrelevant. This is not a place where we vote and fight as to who was right. On a side note, voice of the majority doesn't really matter - it's no secret that the majority is retarded. Only a sociologist would think otherwise. Oh, and I don't think you know what an "insult" is. I would like to see a better argument from you. So far, I haven't really seen anything convincing on your side. It might be more polite to say that the people who would be flaming are assholes than that you are being the asshole. I probably should've done that. I WILL, however, not retract my statement that calling someone's post a shitpost is pretty insulting. Am I blindly defending a mod? Maybe. Are you blindly defending what you (IMO incorrectly) believe to be an infringement on free speech? Maybe. You know, they don't actually remove messages, and it does not actually change any of the meaning. It just makes it funnier and a little less toxic. In: Lobby
Thread: "F- word" issues10 Jun 2016, 04:48 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2016, 04:43 AMKamzil118 As for the censorship, I'm for it since it prevents a hostile response between players, especially guys who decide to hop into the game for the first time. Coolio. I counted your response in the tally already if you were curious. In: Lobby
Thread: The new warspoils system10 Jun 2016, 04:42 AM My two go to bulletins for OKW are disregard for personal safety and grim reaper tool. Since one of those won't work after the patch and the other can't be triple packed, what do you guys recommend for my other two slots? In: Lobby