Profile of turbotortoise

Corrected that for you

LOL, diolch am fawr? xD

i think the USF are one of the most intriguing factions because the lack of unit variety forces one to play a lot differently than any other faction. USF requires a different set of tactics

problem being, unless you're handy with stock units, you can end up pigeon holed in some doctrines that don't leave you with much flexibility or any safety nets.

mines are tame when you have them spotted, as soon as you lose that LOS, from the sweeper moving away, etc, they go live.
pro cruzz tip #3850: vehicles with a sweeper squad in them act as mobile mine detectors.

this is just from the shoutbox, read from the bottom up:
utopia's and fantasies are nice to look at and talk about, but y'can't live life in a christmas card.

iTzDusty: Its weird though cause my 10 games as USF had awesome teammates. Even at the lower levels it wasnt all that bad. Got to rank 8 after 10 matches so placements worked fairly well
Yesterday, 21:11 PM
Budwise: pretty much why 2v2 random is a last resort
Yesterday, 21:09 PM
iTzDusty: *sigh* random 2v2s with shit ELO gets you the worst teammates. Rank 13000 and me vs top 80s, I carried so damn hard and my teammate just turtled #JustrandumbThings
Yesterday, 21:08 PM

iTzDusty: Gdots team : 85-0 as Allies in 4v4 Allies OpieOP
Today, 00:08 AM
kamk: Thing is: all these 10 games so far were absolutely predicted by CELO. There wasn't even anything close in there, well, maybe one out of the ten so far. And this is a huge issue.
Yesterday, 23:51 PM
kamk: Goes both ways NW. Just had the opposite of the "Axis OpieOp", literally a 1v3.
Yesterday, 23:50 PM
kamk: And if you play AT is pretty much easy mode most of the time on either side - same shit like a year ago.
Yesterday, 23:48 PM
NorthWeapon: Relic's matchmaking isn't that much of an issue. It tries to pair similar ELOs together. It's the fact that so many players are searching as Axis to the point where MM decides "screw ELO I'm going to pair you with anyone"
Yesterday, 23:48 PM
kamk: Dunno, i don't roflstomp, i mostly play sim city in 3v3 / 4v4, and try not to base siege in minutes. But apparently quitting got way worse nowadays.
Yesterday, 23:46 PM
kamk: Well, switching doesn't matter at all. Play whatever you want to. In the end MM will decide your faith, same crap like last time i did this (half a year ago)
Yesterday, 23:45 PM
NorthWeapon: Allied it'd compensate for the OP axis in larger game types lol. As crazy as it sounds. I don't understand what's the glory of roflcompstomping your opponents when you're already good and playing as axis, it's soooo boring
Yesterday, 23:45 PM
NorthWeapon: the unfortunate truth kamk :C What makes it worse is majority of players switch over to Axis exclusively in 3v3s and 4v4s because they don't want to lose. Serious why do the good players need to do this? I feel like if the good players stayed playing
Yesterday, 23:44 PM
kamk: So far 1/10 games could have been considered "fair", the rest was compeltely one sided.
Yesterday, 23:42 PM
kamk: Well, i'm just doing a fancy list for the "balance" thread - regarding 3v3 "balance". So far: every game has been decided by MM by a huge margin - lovely!
Yesterday, 23:40 PM
Australian Magic: It's not that bad kamk. Once I was matched 4 times in a row if guy who was dropping all the time during loading screen
Yesterday, 23:38 PM
kamk: Well, not like the games before without quitters were any fun - yay MM.
Yesterday, 23:35 PM
kamk: Hm... 2x quitters in a row. Not too funny :/
Yesterday, 23:22 PM