Profile of LacunaIntroRiot

Women shouldn't be represented in warfare. Not in a game, not irl. Period.. Take out those damn women.

... because there are so little games where ppl like you can only play their male heros with their super male muscles and big maley male swords or masculin cars ... soviets had quite a lot female soldiers, I don't see a reason why they shouldn't be represented.

thx for that info, I thought HP is squad based - in that case ignore my previous argument

maybe giving grens the ability to place mines and reducing the ammo cost of teller mines and anti-personel mines a little would solve many problems currently adressed:
- m3/t70 pushing deep into wehr territory chasing retreating units
- map control of wehr on relatively big maps compared to coh 1
- more versatility on grens with synergy to wehr play
- ability of wehr to negate flanks and lock down vs ability of soviets to be mobile and push fast
- forcing soviets to use mine detectors and spend their early game ammo

... not that it hasn't been mentioned before.

I am not blaming relic or sega for this - we live in a capitalist society, they didn't invented it.

Nevertheless I am expressing my reluctance to support an ongoing development in the gaming industry that continuously offers less content for more money:

- day one content can be included in games in the first place; they are not part of "continuous development costs"
- systematized community support (f.e. steam workshop) allows for free maps, free models, free skins etc.; implementing this costs money (most of it is nonrecurring) but it also binds players to a brand
- dlc's that influence game mechanics pressure players to buy them; their development costs money but most of the said dlc's don't offer a great deal of content at the same time
- bonusses for those who buy a game that hasn't been fully developed yet; this forces developers to make the game appear super cool and to promise lots of things they might not be able to realize

Not to mention premium services (like in BF3), real money auction houses (like in D3), full priced single player games with like 5 hours playtime (wtf!, I don't give a sh*t about achievements, I'm not a monkey) or the release of ridiculously bugged games in general.

... let's say 1 million ppl buy a coh2 commander for only 1$: that is one million dollar for a set of abilities, of which maybe 4 are already implemented in the game. Does it really cost 500.000$ to implement a ability such as f.e. "Allied War Machine"? I don't think so.

Running servers, developing patches, administrating communities and new content do cost money - that doesn't necessarily mean I have to pay money for something, that isnt worth it.

I love playing games and I want to be able enjoy one of my most beloved leisure activities in the future, too.

good point ignoring the bunkers and capping the rest of the field with scout cars and rushing t-34s afterwards. I will try that next time. yes, demo's are very expensive but using them to bring down one crucial bunker implacement might do the trick, too. I'll consider it. I guess I was too focused on destroying them asap instead of using them as an advantage of mobility and capping power .
thx for the answers.