Profile of Alexzandvar

Is that fanboyism at it's best or is there a particular reason why you want them to "drop better" than paras?

They currently pop out of buildings with zero warning with perfect accuracy, so I don't know about you but that seems a little bit better than calling in a plane and waiting for them to complete a drop were they might take causalities.

EDIT: They also cost a lot more than Para's do as well.

Fallsch just suffer from costing to much to deploy versus their actual performance later on. Their veterancy is crap (as in they end up with only slightly more received accuracy than Riflemen do and still less effective health than Cons or Riflemen at Vet 5) when compared to their price resulting in them being useful as Katyusha killer or line breakers and not actually a unit you incorporate into your army.

They also lose so much DPS per dead model member compared to say, LMG Para's (or any other LMG unit) that they just can't really hack it in the current LMG meta.

Fallsch Effective Health at Vet 5: 575

Obersoldat Effective Health at Vet 5: 906

Conscript Effective Health at Vet 3: 738

Riflemen Effective Health at Vet 3: 669

Also Ober's current vet (and the proliferation of building maps and shitloads of cover) makes them much more suited for CQC with IR StG 44's that partially ignore cover than LMG34's because the enemy can pump out more LMG's on more basic/cheaper infantry than you will ever be able to.

I should also mention Fallsch don't actually get offensive vet until vet 4 meaning that for 1-3 they will be putting out as much DPS as they always did.

My suggestion for making Fallsch and Obers more attractive would be to add an extra man onto Fallsch and make them come in by Paradrop (like Paratroopers, just with no scatter and a faster plane) and maaaybe give them a little more survivability. For Obers I would just make them come with regular StG 44's standard and simply convert the StG's into IR ones for free with Spec Op's. Make the LMG34 upgrade function like heavy engineers, you get a fuckload of survivability to small arms but in combat you move slowly.

And...yes I know this Alex. But OKW has never had a building clearing ability before this so its damage to buildings is quite high for OKW.

Seriously Mister Doom Cloud, OKW is not that bad off. They are still potent, though they are due from some more balance changes.

So your justification for the outright false statement that it would need it's damage nerfed if it costs less in that it's more powerful because of the faction it's in? What in the Christ.

3 things are different from the Molotov to the Flame Nade

Projectile speed: Molotov > Flame nade

Throw time: Flame Nade > Molotov

Range: Flame Nade > Molotov

In all other respects they are exactly the same. When it comes to building clearance the molotov is better because it's cheaper and throw time doesn't matter when hitting a station target.

Yeah I don't think you need to lecture me on how to play OKW or the ability to win with OKW either.

USF has worst AT than Oshteer, what's wrong with that? Didn't see any stuglike at 80 fuel in the USF arsenal so far.
UKF has no snare to help the cromwell in the fight.

Reducing the Fuel price will simply put the Pz4 on the field faster than any counter part. It is why the sherman has been buffed in first hand. Both unit are hitting the field around the same time today.

Uh, USF has the M10 which is basically a StuG with AP shells for increased pen, far better mobility and retains 50 range on a turret. If we want to play this game then Ostheer has no light tanks that can stunlock enemy vehicles.

If you put the PIV at 115 fuel it will be fine because Ostheer still needs to overcome the light vehicle phase of the game, which isn't easy and typically requires investment into a 222 or HT. Saying we should count BAR's and Nades in teching is assuming an Ostheer player will neglect any light vehicle play.

UKF also has tons of shit Ostheer doesn't have, so this argument makes no sense because we are comparing medium tanks not the entire faction.

The idea to remove received accuracy IS a good idea on AT guns and MG's, because it makes them way to easy to wipe with high ROF weapons like LMG's and it also makes the MG's on tanks quite deadly against them as well.

The 25% received accuracy bonus is a hold over from an age were the DPS on the field in this game as a lot lower, these day's it just serves as a kick in the dick to the new factions and the old.