The fact that you take stats from a website that are completely wrong and post them tells everyone who is reading this thread the truth: you have no idea what the game is actually like and you are probably a single-faction fanboy who seeks only to buff his faction and doesn't care a damn for balance.
I mean, to suggest that KV1 is in any way comparable to a Tiger shows that:
a) You've never used a KV1
b) You've never used a Tiger against a KV1
c) You've never played against a KV1 at all
d) You're so deluded you didn't notice that KV1 struggles to penetrate a P4, let alone a Tiger
Whichever of these options is correct, it shows that you are a) a noob and b) a fanboy, both of which automatically disqualifies you from rational balance discussions in a reasonable person's mind.
What a waste of time your posts are. Really.
Actually all of those things are wrong, Iv been using KV1's since the release of the Counter Attack Tactics doctrine. I played only Soviets till WFA release, and play OKW, Ostheer, and Soviets fairly regularly.
And yes accidentally posting the wrong stats and then admitting I was wrong obviously means I'm a fanboy, oh wait it doesn't because fan boys don't admit they are wrong.
And I never said that the KV1 was good at killing Tigers, just that it can go toe to toe with them and not instantly die.