Profile of Alexzandvar

He's 100% right about Para's having much more utility than Obers.

Obers are good for.....shooting at infantry? How this is in any way an incorrect point?

Then you must decide if commander are designed to counter stock units or to fill holes or improve units.

Commander design is different for every faction in the game, USF fill holes like OKW does. Soviets are entirely based around using doctrine units as the core of your army.

...and base sector.

Not really that big of a deal, since it would mean your getting 4 fuel inside of 6, which is only 2 less.

Nope. They can help to deal with stock units but all factions have counter in stock units.
Commanders are hard counters for other commanders. B4? Stuka. IS2? Elephant. ISU? Elephnat and on... and on...
It's not like Pz4? IS2. SU85? Elephant T34/76? Tiger. It's not like that. It's helpful but you have everything in tiers to counter other tiers.

Because that's how the game was designed

OKW commanders focus on augmenting your play style by filling holes in your unit roster, Ostheer commanders focus on improving your own units.

Which the playercard gives a tangible metric to measure.

No it doesn't because you get knowledge of the stats from looking them up, knowledge of the meta from streamers and other pro's, and logic is pretty self explanatory.

None of these things have any relation to player card, at all.

Yes, it does. If your player card was completely empty as you didn't play the game the quality of your argument would be zero. We don't need 'theory' players chiming in about balance, we need real players who represent all of the game modes.

If a person took the time to watch streamers, look up stats, watch replays of tournaments, and make themselves knowledgeable about the meta than chances are more than likely that they play the game a fair amount.

It doesn't take any of the things to make a logical balance argument to be good at this game, all you need is good micro and a basic understanding of the unit counter system.

Someone who has reached atleast top 100 in 1v1 ladder has a much better understanding of the game than some guy with rank 2000 and think he knows the game by theorycrafting and watching streams.

How does getting to top 100 make you aware of unit stats or meta knowledge? It means you have experience, but what it takes to be good in this game isn't in any way related to the ability to construct a logical argument.

Quentin is one of the best players in this game, and he is utterly utterly bonkers. Do you think he should be an authority on balance?

Sure thing, rocket scientist with bunch of diplomas in physics and random guy from the street have equally meaningful opinion on quantum mechanics.

The difference between a rocket scientist and a average person is multiple years in college and thousands of hours of studying. The difference between players of different skill is good micro.

Playercards are not really important, unless someone talks some extremely biased shit while swearing to god to play all factions, in that case by viewing the playercard you can instantly identify fanboy warriors of one faction only(like out friend alex here).

I'm much more willing to take discussion with inexperienced player seeking help then one army megalomaniac hero seeking supremacy, playercard lets you easily tell them apart.

Also as a general rule, the better the player, the more valid the opinion simply because good players understand the game and units much better then 5 digit rank ones.

You have made exactly 5 posts in the past 2 weeks that don't involve a personal attack on me lmao.