Profile of Alexzandvar

Damn Queen. This game sounds hopeless. You should uninstall it and move on.

Bear status: Redeemed.

There's no definite proof that the IS-3 saw action in the Far East.

I like how you guys harp on about how inferior Japanese tanks are when the game isn't just about tanks. I still think Anti-tank lunge mines, amongst other things, would be an awesome thing to put into the game. The Japanese can have all kinds of infantry counters to tanks. Given how allied players are used to facing off against markedly superior tanks all the time (with terrible infantry AT, which the Japanese probably wouldn't have) I don't see how different it would be for Japanese players.

The Japanese had horrible AT guns. Their premier AT gun was the equivalent on the 45mm one in Urban Defense Tactics.

And Allied infantry based AT is great the ZiS has only 10 less pen than the Pak40 but far more utility and less fragility. With take aim the USF AT gun can sight for itself.

A KV-1 would be like a King Tiger to the Japanese army.

And to put things in perspective; The KV-1 was the premier mainline Soviet Heavy Tank in 1939-1942

This was the mainline Soviet Heavy Tank when facing off against the Japanese



FEED ME FASCIST SCUM

that is like saying at nade is useless because tanks can you know just move.

If you even edge inside the AT snare range of a unit your going to get snared due to the tracking/ulimited range ability of snares once the unit begins to throw/fire the snare. It's quite a different animal than moving support weapons. Because both parties involved are just moving using legs, and once sees the other coming with an appreciable distance between the two.

just so much lies and just pure conjectures... wow.

If your not using 1919's, BARs and Shocks as well as Para's your doing something wrong.

ISG? 130 fuel? oh you did that stupid okw fuel penalty shit.

The ISG is the worst indirect fire unit in the game next to the USF Mortar HT, I don't count it because I don't count the USF Mortar HT. Both are useless and pretending like they matter is dumb.

On the other hand, pretending like the fuel penalty doesn't matter IS stupid because it has everything to do with unit cost performance and when a unit can enter the field.

tiger trades slightly less at for pretty decently better ai. but i agree. why does tiger need better ai? axis infantry takes care of that anyway. redundant...
target weak point? rof?

The Tiger actually has less chance to wipe a squad/multiple models in one shot than the IS2 does due to the IS2's higher AoE.

The only thing that the Tiger has over the IS2 is ROF, but it only has 1 more ROF, so it's not really much of a advantage.

The Target weak point stun ability 1. Doesn't work on IS2's all the time, and 2. The ROF on the Pak40 is only slightly better than that of the Zis which has anti infantry capabilities as well is less likely to be wiped thanks to a higher squad count.'

The chances of a IS2 wiping a Pak40 in one shot are quite high.

pure conjecture, numbers pulled out of an ass, said like a some statistics available in physics lab. lies, delusions, nit picking, non-logic, etc etc.

It's not pure conjecture to say that more units requires more micro. Allies have a large amount of tools in their tool box many players don't use because they lack the skill to use them.

The Jackson is the most mobile TD in the game, bar none. Most players are stupid and treat it like a SU-85. Demo charges can destroy entire armies in 1 click, most players are to lazy to even bother.

I'm actually agreeing with you, but your so determined to hate me you can't see it.

Good to know Relic's expert QA team is on the case, the same expert team that gave us such great maps as:

City 17 Winter
Rostov
Hill 331
Semosiky
Moscow Outskirts
The map with all the mines in the middle that overheats your computer
Eddlefucked

and much, much more!

I look forward to a whole new host of maps that are flagrantly unbalanced because symmetry, what's that?