Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Stug IV21 Mar 2015, 21:55 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 21:48 PMbraciszek God help USF tanks requiring any less micro than they have already. Spinning in circles, having low health, zero armor, and big hitboxes is USF's special way of deflecting projectiles. Less damage = medium tanks countered more? Logic does not fit out that window. -Complains that Axis have too few medium tanks -Complains that most fragile TD will somehow be more effective at killing medium tanks with 160 damage instead of 240. I meant to say Heavy's instead of Mediums, but the Jackson requires far less micro due to the fact that I can easily moon walk out of a situation while also having a turrent to keep the damage up instead of with a JPIV which doesn't even have a traversable gun, or the SU-85 which can only traverse a small amount. A medium TD with absolute garenteed penetration versus every medium while having over a 70% chance to penetrate a Tiger while also having far more mobility than said Tiger while also costing less and having better range is a tad bit broken. The Jackson needs reduced damage and a better ROF, meaning it does more DPS than it did before while just having less Alpha damage. It costs less than the SU-85 because of how cheap USF's teching is, and only has 20 less pen. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stug IV21 Mar 2015, 21:36 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 21:29 PMscratchedpaintjob so he would be able to penetrate pretty much every axis tank pretty much every time. i see nothing wrong with that, he would not be as effective against mediums, because of the damage nerf, but he would be a heavytank counter. Still he would need a lot of micro and he would be counterable. That would be perfect! what do you dislike about that? Uh, the Jacksons mobility means it requires less micro, not more. It can easily escape a sticky situation in a way the SU-85 and JPIV cannot. Making the Jackson literally the most cost efficient best tank killer in the game that also comes in roughly the same time Ostheer first gets T3 would make Axis medium armor more rare, not less. It would also turn the Tiger into a joke, since the Tiger would be helpless if it's armor was getting penned every time by a tank it couldn't even touch. What makes the Jackson ~okay~ versus heavy armor is the trade off of damage versus pen, meaning that when you pen you fuck a tank up hard, making it's damage reduced but giving it garenteed penetration would mean there is literally no trade off. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stug IV21 Mar 2015, 21:23 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 21:20 PMscratchedpaintjob the nerf to his damage would be absolutlety enough, imo toning him down to 200 damage would be enough of a compensation. the jackson is supposed to be a glasscannon, nerfing his damage more would make him unplayable, you would need to have godlike micro and still do no damage To put things in perspective, the only tanks in the game with more than 240 pen at max range are the Jadgtiger and Elefant. At 240 pen at max range the Jackson would have the best long range penetration of any non-doc tank in the game, as well as all doctrine tanks in the game except for the two previously mentioned. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WW2 Daily Pic21 Mar 2015, 21:20 PM In: The Library
Thread: Stug IV21 Mar 2015, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 21:04 PMG4bb4_G4nd4lf The StuGIV is using the very same gun as the StuGIII. Armor is also pretty much the same. There's no point in adding this tank. It would be easier to simply buff the current StuG but I don't think it is necessary. It's the M-36 (Jackson) that should be changed. A pen buff to 240 at max range and a DMG nerf to 160 will make it less effective vs mediums but more reliable vs heavies. The Jackson would need a price increase then, 240 pen at max range + it's great mobility would make it out class every medium TD in the game in every way except armor. For instance, 240 at max range is almost 100 more than the JPIV at max range and the SU-85 at max range. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stug IV21 Mar 2015, 21:02 PM Makes more sense to give Ostheer the Jadgpanther honestly. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: doctrinal units should21 Mar 2015, 20:59 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 20:26 PMKatitof If it roll a hit, it will hit, will clip through everything and hit. You know, because of the way the projectile works. Hits via scatter miss are less likely, other then that its pretty much the same as any other AT gun, so don't play 3v3 and 4v4 elevated scrubfest maps. 3v3 and 4's maps actually tend to be bigger with less stuff in the way with more wide open area's so it actually gets better. When it preforms best is tied with fortifications; trench spam + Racktens works well. In: Lobby
Thread: doctrinal units should21 Mar 2015, 20:11 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 20:09 PMAustralian Magic You are ignorant. Raketen has pros and cons but double raketen can easily fight with Sherman, especially on maps with buildings. And aim time.. It's not like it can't hit anything. Put raketen on the narrow Stalingrad's road, drive with M3 through that road and raketen will shoot. Trust me. It also loves to shoot the world objects because of the way the projectile works. It's garbage dude, it's almost universally known to be so. Would rather have a 57 or ZiS any day. In: Lobby
Thread: doctrinal units should21 Mar 2015, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 19:25 PMKatitof Psst, shreck is not only OKW AT option. There is another one, really cheap, doesn't require teching and comes from T0, you may not like it, but it does the job. If only the Rackten could hit anything, or not die in one hit. The Puppchen is kinda okay against heavy armor because it doesn't move that fast, but it's utter garbage against mediums because the aim time is waaaaay to long. In: Lobby
Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced21 Mar 2015, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 19:11 PMbraciszek -Thread is about Sturmpios -Telling people to use a tank to roll over infantry because it is a better method than the main gun is sad as hell. Rolling over infantry is better than using the main gun for almost every medium tank in the game lol, and allies just have the most medium tanks. In: COH2 Balance