You said that Jackson's mobility means less micro. So less mobile vehicle = more micro since more mobile vehicles = less micro - according to you.
You can easily reverse SU or JPIV and still shoot at your enemy, unless it's damn obvious flank (which is falt of the SU/JP user). If enemy is attacking your frontally and trying to get behind JP/SU, he won't or he will die.
1 more hit is big difference, not to mention that JP can take usually 1-4hits cuse of very good armor.
But no need to say more. According to you, Jackson does not require intensive micro which is pure bullshit.
And dont you see how big troll you are? In every single thread you get into, you turn it into balace/design thread. No matter what the topic is about. It's just pure trolling.
The JPIV has the least mobility of any medium tank in the game, one simply needs to use it to understand how painful it is to micro with it's piss poor turning and acceleration. Not to mention the fact that it can't traverse it's gun.
And this is a thread about gameplay, it's in the gameplay forum.
And yes more mobile vehicles with better acceleration and turning are easier to micro because they handle better and react faster to your commands. Do you think keeping Jadgtigers effective is easy? No, it handles like ass and is slow as garden, meaning you need to baby sit it to keep it moving and in range while also being ready to reverse it at a moments notice.
Ostheer T3 has 3 big issues; The Jackson, the overpriced nature of T3, and the lack of viability of the StuG III Ausf G and the PIV Varient Ostwind.
This thread was bound to end up discussing the Jackson because it's one of the big 3 issues.