Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: OST Panzerwerfer: Truly Underpowered24 Mar 2015, 19:07 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 19:02 PMQueenRatchet123 u continue to mislead lemme refresh wat YOU said Yes, most Pwerfs operate at exact range or lower than that of mortars because of the fact the Pwerf is only effective at very close range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 19:04 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 19:02 PMJHeartless Show me something in the US Aresenal that has more than a 50% chance to Pen the Panther. Show me something in the USF armor that HAS a 50% chance to bounce any Axis AT. The Panther already has a high HP pool to absorb alot of damage. It effectivley has 1200 HPs against most AT in the game at Vet 0. 1440 Effective HPs at Vet 2 against 90% of all AT. The Jackson has effective 480Hps and costs only 30 fuel less. It has greater DPS and not the 20 range it enjoys against Mediums but 10 against the Panther. The Panther has much less DPS then the Jackson. If the armor were reduced and lowered the Effective HPs of the Panther while trading it off for more DPS the Panther would be just fine. It would also allow AT to vet as there is no Vet reward for constant bounced shots. Another thing Axis need not worry about. All this means is USF needs better AT other than the Jackson, not that the Panther needs to be nerfed. In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 19:03 PM I think the issue is that Allies need more AT options, and USF needs more diverse AT options. Remember people: Buff not nerf. If the Panther needs to be looked at look at what counters it. Why not buff Zooks and the USF AT gun? Up the pen but lower the DPS? How about giving USF a more reliable AT nade? In: Lobby
Thread: OST Panzerwerfer: Truly Underpowered24 Mar 2015, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:54 PMQueenRatchet123 Stop with the BS plz where are the stats for this statement? The Pwerf can only preform at very close range, meaning your having to use it at ranges you would normally only reserve for mortars. "Effective range" and "possible range" are two very different things queen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 18:57 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:55 PMJHeartless I would lower its frontal armor and increase its DPS. Plain and simple. It is no longer LOL bullet proof and will require utilization of its range advantage over Other Mediums and Heavies. It would be rewarded with close to a TD level of damage output. Making it weak against dedicated AT as it should be. What AT is it not weak against? It's already weak to dedicated AT, what's OP is Blitz allowing it to moonwalk away. In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:50 PMKatitof Apparently you have learned a grand total of nothing from the math lesson I gave you. When you compare 2 values, you need to make one of them the point of reference. 160 is 66% of 240 240 is 150% of 140, therefore 50% more. Which makes your post which we can find here: http://www.coh2.org/topic/32484/real-talk-panther/post/304768 An utter bullshit from mathematical POV. That is literally what I just said. And the ZiS gun DOES have a 50% or more chance to pen the Panthers. 200.0/190.0/180.0 = 62.5% chance/59.3% chance/ 56% chance And considering the SU-85 has the exact same pen profile.... THE RED HERRING AGAIN! See DPS post. The Pak40 has MORE DPS then the Jackson PERIOD. It will kill armor FASTER THEN A JACKSON PERIOD. If your talking about Alpha strikes thats all that the extra damage will get you. Less Rolls of the RNG dice. So it will either score a Pen and do great or Bounce and totally blow its DPS out the window because it has a SLOW RELOAD TO COMPENSATE FOR THE HIGH DAMAGE PER SHOT. I think you are just being willfully ignorant here. So? The Pak40, will kill armor faster. But it's not comparable to to the Jackson because one is an AT gun and the other is a highly mobile TD. What is your point? In: Lobby
Thread: OST Panzerwerfer: Truly Underpowered24 Mar 2015, 18:50 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:39 PMKatitof Will you stop spitting bullshit already for RNGods sake! Every single day you are being corrected at least 10 times. It always have shot ten rockets, it still does. It have tad lower scatter then katy, you would know that if you took 30 seconds of looking at their stats. It has not always shot 10 rockets. If you have ever used the Assault Officer you would see when you use his barrage ability it fires the original number of rockets. And it's scatter is larger, but it also fire's the rockets in a higher arc as well as few ones. It is more effective in close range than the Katyusha, but that's the only range it's effective in. Then of course you have the issue were it's in t4... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 18:48 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:46 PMJHeartless There is no such thing as MBT in WWII thats a post war construct. Axis has plenty of AT and have never ever and never will hurt in that department. After all the Pak40 is like a Jackson with Better Pen. Ost can make that in T2. JP4 DPSwise is almost EXACTLY what a Pak40 is. It just has worse Pen. Its not like anything outside of an IS2 it really matters though. And then there are Shreks... OKW won many many games before they buffed the Panthers armor back to prenerf levels. I am sure they would survive....somehow...yknow like they did... The Pak40 doesn't do 240 damage, the JPIV is the least mobile medium in the game, and the Panther nerf was before OKW was added as a faction. In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 18:47 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:43 PMFaustCostBulletin Nobody is saying such a nerf should come without a buff to Raketenwerfer. But your argumentation is extremely forced, think about the tank itself. Allies have a lot of problems on their own and their tank destroyers are still worse. Axis can do the AT without tanks far better because of Panzerschrecks. Panther is overperforming. If an overperforming unit is nerfed properly, it becomes balanced, not useless.It would then still be built. Bazooka is utterly useless and not even remotely decent even against Panzer IV. So "bazooka blob" is out of the question. Panzer IV can fight Soviet tanks effectively and Jackson cannot brute force a Panzer IV with panzerschreck and stunning Pak40 around. It would be the same thing with Panther; you avoid the enemy tank, except Panzer IV stands a far better chance because Jackson is far worse than a Panther and Panzerschreck is far superior to something like PTRS or Bazooka. If you want T3 to be used more , you should first admit that Panther is overperforming. You would then have a case to make Panzer IV better. As it stands you're supporting the notion that there's no way T3 should ever get a buff when Panther is so good. The Panther isn't over preforming, rather, it is literally the only turret non-doc Axis tank in the game that we see built anymore thanks to a lack of options. The Tiger is spammed because it is cheaper, the OKW Panther is often mandatory because of the non-viability of the Rackten and the fact the JPIV is extremely unmobile and lacks any kind of traversable gun. The Zook is useless against the KT and Panther, but it does excellent DPS to the PIV, Ost, and StuG III. You would see more Zooks if you saw more Axis mediums, unfortunately they do not exist for OKW and are non-viable for Ostheer. And I think the last Panther nerf can tell you were the unit will end up if it's nerfed; the garbage bin. In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 18:41 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 18:39 PMJHeartless Those all sound like problems not related to the Panther overperforming. They sound like other issues that may need to be addressed in other ways. Such as a Rak buff etc. And LOL@Zook blobs. Must be 4v4 your talking about there... I just had to deal with it in a 2's game. With a muni cache here and there you can get a fair amount of Zooks out. And they do a good level of DPS to mediums such as the PIV, Ost, and StuG. EDIT: Regardless, the Panther is not over preforming, if allied armor needs help it needs help, we don't need the last non-doc MBT in the game for Axis to be reduced to non-viability. In: Lobby