Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?13 Apr 2015, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 13:04 PMJHeartless Here is another fun fact and why it sucks so hard: Ma Duece: Aim time multi far: 1.0 Aim time multi near: 0.5 Ready aim time min: 0.375 Ready aim time max: 1.0 Post firing cooldown: 0.0 Post firing aim time: 0.5 Fire aim time min: 0.25 Fire aim time max: 0.625 Hitlers Buzzsaw/Maxim: Aim time multi far: 0.5 Aim time multi near: 0.5 Ready aim time min: 0.125 Ready aim time max: 0.125 Post firing cooldown: 0.0 Post firing aim time: 1.0 Fire aim time min: 0.125 Fire aim time max: 0.125 As you can see its the Rakentenwerfer of Machine Guns. Not only is it fragile, has no AOE Suppression (exactly like the Maxim not the MG42) but it costs more comes later and has no health at all. So Pros and Cons: Good Suppression for a single target Arc Be Damned Average Light Vehicle damage but not as good as the DSHK Cons: Comes late No AOE Suppression Takes FOREVER to target anything ever like EVER Is expensive Is Fragile Its Terrible. Please end all discussions that says that its anything but. Because your arguments are invalid. TLDR the M2HB is a nerfed version of the DSHK which also is lackluster. How can you be so wrong about so many things at once!? Every machine gun in the game does AoE suppression, just not a lot of it in the case of the Kubel and Maxim. And it doesn't cost more either! .50 cal Suppression far: 0.06 Suppression radius: 10.0 Nerby multiplier: 0.8 MG42 Suppression far: 0.012 Suppression radius: 11.5 Nerby multiplier: 0.8 Reload on the .50 call is also better to: .50 cal Reload Duration multi far: 1.0 Duration multi near: 1.0 Duration min: 3.0 Duration max: 4.0 Frequency min: 12.0 Frequency max: 12.0 versus MG42 Reload Duration multi far: 1.0 Duration multi near: 1.0 Duration min: 6.0 Duration max: 6.0 Frequency min: 5.0 Frequency max: 5.0 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??13 Apr 2015, 05:13 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 13:11 PMOZtheWiZARD No. In 1v1 it's a pointless unit. It can be good for your 4v4 tank spam feast but in 1v1 it's slow, sluggish and only deals AT damage. I would only consider it if my opponent went SU-85, ISU-152 only. In 1v1 if you play your cards right you can beat Jadgtiger with single T-34-76. What is supporting your Jadgtiger? An allied player without armor support is a allied player who will lose a game. EDIT: You have never even used it lol, why am I saying this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: improving volks small arms dmg to vehicles13 Apr 2015, 03:32 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 03:17 AMCookiezNcreem Kubel should get more pen and damage against m3 and retreating snipers. first 5 mins of OKW vs Sovs is just OKW bending over and taking it from Sov T1, whether it's sniper Or m3 or penals. Or just flat con spam into M3. Soviet can just choose how he's gonna abuse you. The Kubel got it's damage on the move nerfed pretty hard, would be nice if they reverted it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW be able to build caches?13 Apr 2015, 01:50 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 01:35 AMvan Voort You can't on the one hand ask for MP sinks and the other complain that everything that is too expensive... I'm not saying it's to expensive, I'm saying that you have literally 2 options and that's it. The reason why caches for OKW would be a bad idea is because it would give them far more income than they were supposed to have (talking in a ones perspective). Imagine, for a scond, that an OKW player has his/her infantry horde of 2 obers /pfus + 4 volkshreck. The OKW player is folating 800mp, and doesn't need more tech to field KT. WHat does he do? He takes that mp and puts it into fuel caches. These caches do not detract from his infantry horde (he already has them), because they do not bleed his income over time, it is merely a sink for excess manpower. This results in a KT coming out much faster than it normally would, but at little to no real cost the the OKW player, because he was just going to be floating the mp anyways. This is the problem with adding caches to OKW. I would be fine if OKW had for example access maybe to an opel truck for 400mp and 10 popcap, so that the boost to economy would come at a great cost to not only manpower, but to future manpower income. I honestly don't think that OKW really needs any opels trucks or caches anyways, the faction is fine as it is. Your first point contradicts the second. If OKW was fine then it wouldn't float insanely huge amounts of MP. EDIT: Although it destroys my soul to have to point this out (since it should be insanely obvious) the MP float wouldn't occur if you had caches to make since like with every other faction in the game you would invest your extra MP into caches, saying "oh and you will have 800 MP to!" just makes it seem like you don't understand that OKW doesn't actually get extra MP over other factions. MP dumps + extra MP = no more extra MP not MP dumps + extra MP = extra MP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW be able to build caches?13 Apr 2015, 01:11 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 01:09 AMTobis Or increased teching costs Still not going to fix the float, best way to do it would be the aforementioned Opal truck idea or add a "conversion of MP to fuel" or "conversion of MP to munitions" to one of the HQ trucks. Iv floated (pun intended) an idea before to reduce all OKW vehicle fuel prices by 25% and increase the OKW vehicle MP prices by 50% before. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Which Faction Is OP At Present & Why ?13 Apr 2015, 01:07 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 00:44 AMAerohank Excellent post My sentiments exactly, and the amount of viable commanders was almost doubled with the PTRS buff. In: Lobby
Thread: Should OKW be able to build caches?13 Apr 2015, 01:03 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 01:00 AMvan Voort Yes you can spend it on support weapons No you can't spend it on vehicles, that's the point of the faction design. Oh what plentiful support weapons are these! A 480 MP ISG and a super fragile AT gun There isn't any real logical reason for OKW to keep it's current MP float, and OKW should be given options to reduce it which translates into MP dumps like caches and or Opal trucks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW be able to build caches?13 Apr 2015, 00:59 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 00:39 AMTobis Then why would they even make caches? It's easier to blob infantry, and by this logic why doesn't every player of every faction not just blob infantry and wait for tan- oh In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW be able to build caches?13 Apr 2015, 00:28 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 00:02 AMTobis What makes you think adding caches in any way is not a buff to OKW? Why would people even build caches if it was not better than just floating all the manpower? It will let them get tech and vehicles out quicker, at the cost of really nothing. The floated manpower is wasted now as is, letting OKW convert more manpower into greater field presence in no way fixes the problem. It does, the biggest problem with OKW is the fact you can only spend MP on more infantry, you can't spend it on support weapons, and you can't spend it on vehicles. If you are spending MP on caches your helping drain off that huge float, and being able to build more tanks helps drain it off further. The issue here is that OKW can already benefit from caches at a reduced rate, so what's the issue with just giving OKW the ability to make them to? Really the Opal truck idea is much better, but I doubt Relic will do it. I would rather face say an extra Panther or an early Luchs than 3 Ober squads or a giant horde of Volks. Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 00:26 AMQueenRatchet123 imagine 4 okw players in 4v4 spamming caches. they would skip panther and go straight for 18 minute KT's and Jt's You know people value Ostheer team mates for more than just caches right? Ostheer team mates can already spam caches as well as fuel drops to get early KT's, and you can't get early JT's because they are tied to CP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Which Faction Is OP At Present & Why ?12 Apr 2015, 23:50 PM Soviets are the most powerful overall by a long shot, I find myself having the most fun with them due to there simply no longer being any "bad" choices strat wise. Guards are great, shocks are great, cons are great life is great In: Lobby