Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Remove free lieutenant2 May 2015, 19:11 PM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 16:06 PMelchino7 Getting a PV 175/.66 + 80/.66 = 386 175/.73 + 80/.73 = 349 Getting a KT 260/.66 + 40/.66 + 80/.66 = 575 260/.73 + 40/.73 + 80/.73 = 520 If you are still gonna theorycraft with fuel convertion, again, mind you do it rightly. Well first off, since strategic points and caches do in fact give you .66 (or at least almost exactly .66 since it's only rounding up from 1.98 to 2) if your not working off fuel points then OKW really is actually getting the amount of fuel it's supposed to, but the reason OKW get's 5 fuel from fuel points is that they get 4.62 fuel, but the game can't do fractions so it rounds up. And are you suggesting adjusting fuel income is theory crafting? Because it is literally how teching and build times are balanced. The reason why the Schwer is 80 fuel is because with the income disability your paying the same (or close to) Soviet t4 or t3. In: Lobby
Thread: Axis Goliath2 May 2015, 09:50 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 09:13 AMTheSleep3r Yeah, soviets shouldn't use those stupid doctrines and instead build those scalable non doc infantry, viable medium armor and stock heavy. Shame those players don't do that Are you seriously implying that A. Soviets were designed without commanders in mind and that B. OKW actually has mediums tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Crawling Penal Satchel Charge Party Patrol2 May 2015, 08:01 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 07:10 AMacosn Maybe I'm missing something but the Soviet players who use Maxims tend to get their asses handed to them. Ostheer players can just lay in on them with rifle grenades. And the .50 cal is just shit. The .50 cal suppresses on the first burst, and uh, the maxim is fairly easy to use unless your micro is literal garbage lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove free lieutenant2 May 2015, 08:00 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 07:15 AMSpecialka Pro hint: do not truck push if you are not able to keep alive your truck. Better, put the truck in your base. Btw, I do not see why this is relative to tech cost and speed. OKW has the fastest and cheapest teching. Deal. With. IT. 1. I never mentioned truck pushing. 2. The LT and teching are relative to tech cost and speed. 3. No, that would be USF. You can rush a major just as fast as you can rush a schwer. Soviets and Ostheer don't tech rush because of "call in meta". In: Lobby
Thread: Should OKW get a heavy artillery piece?2 May 2015, 07:56 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 07:45 AMDakkaIsMagic I'll just drop this here and watch the cherry-picking from a good distance. Rocket artillery =/= heavy artillery piece. In game heavy artillery is MP based, and has a crew. It's not cherry picking. Rocket Artillery is still Artillery. wow it's almost like an artillery piece is a specific descriptor. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove free lieutenant2 May 2015, 06:55 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 06:13 AMSpecialka Truck costs 40 fuel and the Flak truck 80 btw. Or maybe we should remove vet 4 system, and free repair/heal/flak. And the first one is free btw, and you do not need to tech up to unlock grenade/schreck. Which means OKW has the cheapest teching BY FAR. Seriously Alex, can you be less biaised or are you forcing yourself to be the center of attention? The first tier is free for every faction but USF. And as pointed out earlier the fuel disability means said HQ's will hit the field about the same time you could make T4/T3 as Soviets. Except there is very little incentive for Soviets to rush T3/T4 (most of the time), so they don't, while OKW depends often times on rushing the Schwer. And you have to tech up to get the shrek? It's why losing a truck before their first HQ is converted is almost pretty much an automatic loss for OKW. In: Lobby
Thread: Remove free lieutenant2 May 2015, 05:49 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 05:15 AMelchino7 This is gonna be an offtopic to finally debunk the myth that OKW is at a .66 disadvantage. I'm gonna do you the math, again, since it seems it's hard for you to admit hard facts. -Base income at 50-50 map control, represents 20% of your fuel income as OKW. -You are getting 5f instead of the 7f on fuel points (71%) -You get 2f instead of 3f on strategic points (66%) With that been said, i'm gonna present you #MathOP -1 Strategic point OKW: 6 Rest: 7 Result: 85.71% -2 Strategic points + 1fuel OKW: 13 Rest: 17 Result: 76.47% -5 SP + 1f OKW: 19f Rest: 26f R: 73.07% -10 SP + 2f OKW: 34f Rest: 48f R: 70.83% Now, please, try to show me how is OKW getting .66fuel. PD: why is this relevant? Because that 4-6 percent difference, means a lot on the long run. The reason you get 5 instead of 7 fuel is because when the game adjusts fuel it rounds up. If it was 66% you would be getting fraction of fuel meaning the game has to round up. When OKW can get .66 fuel without the math giving them a fraction capable being rounded up, they do. The reason I state .66 instead of going through a complicated math formula to adjust every price to assume optimal conditions I adjust it by the standard .66 reduction because that's the modifier Relic put on the fuel income. You get 2 instead of 1.98, you get 5 instead of 4.62. EDIT: Engineering major 2op. And the difference of 4-6% is literally 5-6 fuel, which is one salvage, chill your tism' In: Lobby
Thread: Why do so many folks take this game so seriously?!2 May 2015, 05:15 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 04:37 AMTea Maker Machine The amount of dedication, efforts and time we put into analyzing and discussing specific details about this game amaze me. Not to mention all the antagonism and drama, lol. I don't know about antagonism, almost everyone I regularly argue with on .org is on my friends list and we still play games together. I think the community is mature enough to agree to disagree about some things and be adults when it comes to actually playing the game. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Crawling Penal Satchel Charge Party Patrol2 May 2015, 03:13 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 02:55 AMacosn Except that Germans swim in suppression mechanics. Maybe you need to accept that there's consequences to building your OKW loltrucks outside your base? Do you seriously not use the maxim or .50 cal? Because both are good at what they do. The MG34 is worse than both. Infantry being able to crawl up to any suppression platform and kill it with frangible explosives is insanely dumb considering throwing objects tends to be hard when your face is in the dirt. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Crawling Penal Satchel Charge Party Patrol2 May 2015, 02:13 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2015, 02:05 AMArclyte lol, a nerf penals thread Penals being able to throw satchels while suppressed is just as retarded as any unit being able to throw a nade while suppressed. In: COH2 Balance