What i dont understand is why seeking or in this case Kimbo is the one who had to deliver the context for this clip. Isnt it the job of those who accuse him of cheating to prove that the situation doesnt allow anything else than a maphack to be the explaination before Seeking has to defend his position?
How many of those clips can be explained with the context of the situation instead of Seeking writing an essay about why, when, how and what his feelings, hopes and dreams were in an intense game?
True, the onus is on the accusers to provide the FULL arguments. And the unnecessary clip spam doesn't exactly make it easy to properly analyze the context. Some of the clip titles are also heavily suggestive which doesnt help.
The problem is seeking just taints his credibility by continuing to lie about the deadbolt thing. He insisted on the FoW thing several times. It wasn't like he made some casual comment about it that is now used against him. So while calling him a liar might go to far he was at least bullshitting about it (in the sense of just saying something that seemed to work as a defence without caring about the truth). Combine that with his dishonesty regarding deadbolt and I feel like Aerafield's point is vaild.
On a side note: I don't get why no one seems to differentiate between the clips from ML (cheating in ML would obviously require a perma ban from the event) and automatch (imho messing around with a maphack in automatch should not lead to a perma bann but that could just be me). Doping in sports does not necessarily entail a ban for life either. I don't see why a small RTS with a tiny playerpool should have higher standards.