Profile of Aladdin

Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2015, 07:05 AMJewdo

1st of all, Aimstrong is pretty much a fucking legend.

2nd. You should realize that Aimstrong has developed a style of play - @ legendary skill level - practising it against all the known, normal styles, while his opponents face off against his for the 1st time

and 3rdly. Brits rely on key units, considered borderline, or just plain OP, as they only option. One single style of play, centered on a over performing unit, was the save and grace of a single brave soul, who lost anyway. Well ok, that was OCF, we can use the croc cant we?

Anyway, thats my opinion about brits. I like your way of thinking but I really feel brits are in a very bad place in 1v1.

Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2015, 14:53 PMspam.r33k

"just remove them" is so common and not constructive at all. if pointing that out is an ad hominem, hell, ill gladly be the culprit here. as i mentioned before this wasnt directed at aladdin, but rather at a way of "dealing" with problematic untis in general.
why not leave the unit as it is until it can be adressed? i doubt its one of the biggest balance concerns at the moment.
and there are ways to deal with it other than removing emplacements. play around with brace/emplacement durability (make it easier to decrew so it bleeds MP, but make it more durable), maybe give the mortar pit a decent barrage cooldown or even a counterbarrage (since compared to mortars and isgs it is immobile), give it a slightly higher range (once again its immobile so at least it should outrange other indirect fire options).
but yeah that took me like 30 secs to come up with and with a little diligence one should be able to come up with proper solutions (other than removal)
if on the otherhand you just dont like emplacements, just say so. then removing it would be a solution indeed