Profile of Aladdin

USF ALL STARS

Do you like USF? Are you in the top 300 in 1v1,2v2,3v3, 4v4 for USF, in either ELO+ or wins?

Sometimes, do you just want to hop on COH2 automatch with a good USF partner, and kick some axis ass for the GLORY OF FREEDOM??

Look, no, further!!!

you should advertised ur clan better noob!

I thought dis could be ur clan intro:

It's not competitive because
1. The maps are not designed in a competitive way.
2. Core game mechanics (map control, positioning, well mixed army force) play less of an role
3. There are not enough "competitive/ good players".

When I played those modes extensively for a 6 month period (stopped about 1-2 months ago) there were hardly any players I'd call good. I consider myself a mediocre 1vs1 / 2vs2 players, yet me and my team were kings in those modes. Holding #1 for axis & allies because most games were over before 15 minutes, I can only recall about 3 deserved losses (all other loses were due drop hack or bugsplat) and those were also only against those teams that hold 1-3 position. Even those players that were top 20 ( I had always elo running) were just bad and checking their playercards often revealed ranks 500+ in 1vs1 & 2vs2.
Again it's not about ranks, its rather about understand and excelling in core game mechanics, those mechanics which are necessary to master when understanding balance.

Your 3 points u mentioned:

1. Maps are designed in competitive way or not? similar to other mode's maps some of them are some of them are not, so no difference. there are actually some maps which are designed very well, some maps which favor allies more, and some axis', some are balanced some not. exactly like other modes.

2. According to what? If you wanna play at competitive level you gotta actually take em all into account. You can have your own/team strategy, but again there are big differences between those mods in the skills u require; map awareness etc, which is why some coh2 1v1 top veterans fail in team games any mode bigger than 1v1

3. Let me word that better for you "good players of those modes don't get same reputation as 1v1 veterans" but that doesn't mean those modes are not competitive.

You are wrong sir, those modes are competitive and there are some good players in those modes, just as there are in 1v1 mode

And you said u checked the top 20 players and they had 500+ ranks in 1v1? That actually means they prob play that mode as fun mode and not competitive!
Actually how many (not top 20) top 10 1v1 players do you want me to name you (I have seen their playercard that they had +1000 ranks in 4v4s?!! does that mean they are bad?! yes or no! it means they are good in the mode the like and play competitive

1vs1 & 2vs2 are competitive modes and 3vs3+ are fun modes

Based on what u think 3v3 and 4v4 are fun modes and not competitive modes? It all depends if u wanna play any mode at competitive level on as fun. 3v3 and 4v4 modes and be competitive in u play them at that level, and 1v1, 2v2 modes can be fun modes if u don't care to play them at competitive level

There are players who play 3v3 and 4v4 modes at competitive level, and there are players who play 2v2, 1v1 as fun modes and vice versa

I think the issue remains, that you don't ignore, because you respond to them (us?) in posts, and you do so in what comes across as a very rude way.

You have no right to say your game mode (1v1) is more important, its not. We all have a right to play a balanced and fair game, we paid for COH2 as well.

The issue with this patch, balance-wise, is how bad it is for those larger game modes. The difference in win rates is as high or higher than it has ever been, making those larger game modes mostly a test of patience. I understand and support changing OKW, but not releasing it in such a state as to destroy 3 other game modes to help 1. Especially when those 3 account for the majority of the population.

this, plus This game has 4 modes, and if you don't enjoy any of those modes you don't have to play that mode. But they are all important and if one is more important it's certainly not the one which is the least played, if the game is supposed to keep it's playerbase and a community like this

How am I clueless if I have statistics to back it up. Numbers don't lie. UKF consistently ranks last place in 1v1s whether that corresponds with your personal experience or not.



I've played this game twice as much as you. I've played this game since release and played every playlist and faction in arranged or randoms (but mostly arranged cuz surprise surprise some people like to enjoy playing the game strategizing/cooperating with friends). Just because I've taken off from CoH2 doesn't mean shit.

Idk who gave you the permission to point out who deserves to be heard and doesn't.



It's really baffling how you're going to ignore 2v2+. You're blatantly biased, not even attempting to hide it calling team games "scrub." Lol? Do you honestly not care for CoH as a whole and a successful game?

That's some insane tunnel-vision selfish game-killing plan you got there. If you wan't the CoH 2 community to be decimated, then go ahead and say it. You gotta think from the developer/producer's perspective, not a select few "elite." It's a videogame, many people play it, not just you?

There's a ginormous community in CoH, and most of them play 2v2+. That is fact. IF balance was changed based on popular demand, 1v1 would be least looked at, I hate to break it to you. You were there on that Russian tournament yourself and saw how live a poorly marketed non-English tournament went simply because it included large team games, I don't get why this needs any further explanation.

Well said. It's interesting how some someone's arrogance leads to his stupidity, even though you spent a lot of time responding to him