Profile of aaa

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1487

General Information
Register Time: 12 Aug 2014, 04:00 AM


Thread: Should Relic employ professional people for vital roles?23 Apr 2016, 13:38 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2016, 08:20 AMInverse If you can't make a living doing what you do, you're an amateur, not a professional. To be fair, some games have communities large enough to support professional non-developer-funded content creators, therefore community-created content can be professionally made. My main point was that creating content as a community member does not magically make you a professional. with that defenition profesional isnt always good. For instance i dont know what is the professianal logic behind OKw tree alowing make 2 luchs before oponents 1 t70. In: Lobby
Thread: Should Relic employ professional people for vital roles?23 Apr 2016, 08:18 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2016, 07:45 AMInverse Community-created content is by definition not professional. There are no professional CoH2 players. Relic employs professionals. Professional programmers, professional game developers, professional game designers. This thread doesn't make any sense. what is defenition of professional. In: Lobby
Thread: April 27th Balance Preview Mod Release Notes23 Apr 2016, 08:07 AM Some more thoughts 1. Smg doesnt decrese volks long range dps. This will make them vastly superior to cons while having same price. 2. In most part it will be the same smg-volks blobs instead of rpg-volks bloobs. Sometimes with at-gun since it can retreat. Why not make a better change - rpg upgrade reduce squads AI dps like 20-30% and make them move slower. That will be perfectly balanced. I only agree that okw needed to bring unit unlock cost in line with other facs. And allied late TDs needed buffs In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 27th Balance Preview Mod Release Notes23 Apr 2016, 04:55 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2016, 04:40 AMmiragefla I thought about that and even discussed it with Cruzz awhile, back, but I think the general consensus was Sturms now have too much on their plate. They repair, are a fighting unit, are responsible for buildings, as well as sweeping. I could be wrong and I would be willing to test Sturm Shrecks -so as long as it locks out the sweeper- to see how OKW would far. Of course, I will keep saying this, the Raketen buff should have been with OKW for the StGs to see how it would fair. Maybe I haven't played versus enough high-level players in my mod and all we be revealed on the May 7th tourney, but OKW is not in that bad of a spot without shrecks, depending how their other support gets boosted to compensate. @Atomic Rocket: Those were very old stats. the StGs got a considerable boost to mid while their long is on par with a volk rifle. Dont nerf mines plz. If 50 muni tellers still oneshot ligh vehicles for 250/50. Then Why not let mine kill just 2-3 models for 40-70mp. How much models trip-wire-flares kill ussualy after the patch? 1? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Mastering the art of "Con spam"23 Apr 2016, 04:29 AM 4 cons opening only make sense in a map where early control over central area = gg. Such as semosky summer. This allows not to get outnumbered since if you tech to t1 or t2 you will get minimum 1 squad disadvantage in a first fight no matter what. If there were any fighting units in t0 noone would spam cons In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: April 27th Balance Preview Mod Release Notes22 Apr 2016, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2016, 17:21 PMSpanky Does any one of you who is complaining understood, that this is a balance preview, so anything can change. they dont change a lot once notes with any name released. For my view 1 thing is certain. It must be 1 of 2 options. 1. remove okw shreks 2. nerf obers to the state when they would be counterable by non-docs infantry by cons. Now they only can be killed by t70 which gets harcountered by shreks In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Strange changes after patch22 Apr 2016, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2016, 09:36 AMBlalord M3 win against 2-3 kubel easily dont you ever care what lies you say? 2 kubels kill m3 even from the front - thats the 100% lie of you that can be proven easily. When they are positiond like that when 1 attacks fronal armor then another threatens to attack rear m3 will never win. That was closer than i thought kubel saved by rng abondoned, spios 1 hit away from elimination. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Strange changes after patch22 Apr 2016, 09:26 AM Whatever you say grandmaster. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Strange changes after patch22 Apr 2016, 09:21 AM M3 hard counter 1 kubel. 2 of them destroy m3 esp if spios somewhere near. While CEs are absolutely useless in early fight like this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Strange changes after patch22 Apr 2016, 09:17 AM Kubel spam is a total coinflip. I doubt it was possible to counter that with money wasted on t1. Plus m3 destroyed kubel abandoned rng bs. If i would somehow get past this opening his kubels would become garbage. Im still not sure what is best against it probably 2mg 3cons. In: COH2 Balance