You seem to want no risk in your defence.
If you get outflanked you should be punished.
Getting flanked is fine.
Getting flanked when they can shoot through a wall I can't is not fine.
Stop implying I don't think I should be allowed to be flanked. I have never said that. I even said I would be ok with being able to use a throwable weapon from that side.
Without this USF would have zero counter to T0 MG42 for the first couple minutes of game play. Smoke and flank doesn't exist until fuel wall/unlock time has passed.
Same applies but to a lesser extent to OKW only difference is SPio's beat RE's at building clearance.
If they remove this then T0 MG's need to go with it.
The defender can always switch its facing and the attacker can always attack from multiple angles. This is tactics.
I don't want to be able to fire from a side with no windows, but I also don't want to be able to have the attacker do it.
Play and counter-play.
Play
Guy gets in a building with an mg.
Counterplay
You can flank it, swarm it, flame it, nade it, smoke it, mortar it.
And that's all the things you can do in the first 5 minutes depending on how you decide to respond.
If there is a side of the building with no windows, more power to you head in from that side. But you shouldn't be able to
SHOOT THROUGH A FUCKING STONE WALL WITH INFANTRY