|
Well, Stuka has guns, P-47 has rockets - they are supposed to miss more. Also I am not disappointed by P-47 performance. It misses a few shots but generally it's okish especialy now, when havy axis armor is nurfed. KT can resist to such an air stike combined with a T34/85 attack for instance, if you extract it from the area, but it is soooo slow so it will probably end up dead. Don't even hope to survive to such combo with a Tiger for instance.
Stuka has powerfull guns, in addition, most of allied armor it's not as thick as the krupp steel. So it's not just about guns. |
I'm talking your general profile, not this particular case, don't get so worked up  And I'm pretty sure I've already told you how to use google properly when you were attacking someone some time ago.
Well I can't see how your profile is any better than what you think my general profile is. What you called "attacks" are replies to biased people and they are more often adressed to the most biased. Probably because of this you feel verry "attacked" most of the time, because you are a verry biased allied fan. Nothing personal, I assure you. But whatever, enough with this off-topic pudding. |
Actually, you're completely wrong(surprise surprise here).
ISG is most effective at shooting ANY squad size or spread, because it suppresses them. It also have longer range in general, meaning when both shoot target at 60 range, ISG is even more accurate.
Pack howis larger AoE means not much when it rarely hits anything because of much higher scatter values, it might wipe now and then, but its rarity(IS-2 vs Tiger AI anyone?).
Neither of them really wipes anything, but it takes a single model hit from both to win an engagement due to suppression and ISG is much more likely to score a hit, therefore its superior support unit.
This I can't even.... |
Ohhh, biased scrub attacking playercards without showing his own going against experienced top player of all factions.
This is always good!
maybe you are on pills? I attacked no ones' player card. "showing his own". Sow your own yourself. Just LOL. |
Stuka > 120, Mortar HF Incendiary rounds > 120, LMG blob flanking > 120, Popping jaegers/falls from buildings behind 120 > 120. Stolen 120 > 120, Blob flank > 120, 10 muni grenades > 120. Only time I have a hard time vs 120 is when I go Ostheer without mortar hf and am constantly failing to flank the 120 due to Soviet mines/blob. 
Hey, I got some too: Stuka dive bomber > 120, CAS incendiary air strike > 120, panzerwerfer (  ) > 120 (err... really?), 2 ostheer mortars > 120, ...umm... what was the point again?! |
Man If I had a dollar for every time you mentioned me in a thread I hadn't posted in....
I was tempted to say that too, but then, if you had, I would be jalous. Because you would be richer than me.  |
|
Cloacking it's not a problem. It becomes a problem when only one faction / some factions benefit from it while others don't or when a faction benefits from it more than others. |
|
Underpowered. The ISG. In fact, underpowered it's maybe not the right word. To expensive for what it actualy does. That's more apropriate. |
|
I voted "indifferent" for these reasons:
1. I don't think COH2 needed a new faction. If you put in game a new faction for allied though, put one for Axis to;
2. I think a new faction will RUIN balance again and I think Relic will fail again and again to balance the game;
3. I think a new faction will create a total mess in one's known and validated tactics;
4. VCoh didn't have 5 factions;
6. Alot of factions creates a taste of a cheap product, issued just for pocket filling;
7. the new faction will come with new DLC commanders = > an even higher mess;
8. Related to new content Relic could just issue some new commanders for WFA factions, introduce custom commanders feature and War effort mode. That would have been enough.
Period. |
|
Let's consider this situation:
You are a middling player who is playing from time to time - not every day because you haven't got the time - though you would like to. And when you play, sometimes you play one - maybe 2 games in a row because of time. You struggle and earn your 3000 -2000 or whatever place number in the ladder. Then some top 50 smurf is comming with a new account being automatched with you while he is 500 below you in the ladder - because of smurf account. And beat the hell out of you insuring a severe ladder drop for you.
What would you think? That it is fair? |
0
_Hiena_
xingyuguan
Relic Entertainment
