Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: Not one step back tactics?23 Sep 2014, 14:46 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2014, 05:49 AMKatitof no end game -check no potent late game call-ins -check no weapon upgrades -check gimmicky -check potentially cheezy -check huge potential to punish the user more then anything -check Well, to me it seems like it got everything needed to become soviet commander. LMAO In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Gameplay vs Relic - Balance Power - Enjoy Everybody23 Sep 2014, 14:17 PM wait was this a custom/invite -only game? how did u get all those pro players in a 4v4!??!?! In: Replays
Thread: Game leavers23 Sep 2014, 14:07 PM Hmmm I think we should change the surrender option really It should be 3 yes and 1 no = surrender. Leaving should be penalized if: 1. You drop after 30 seconds - 1 minute Dcing or dropping because of internet should not be punished (unless it is after 1 minute). I am getting an impression that so many people just drop when something, anything goes bad. Please think about your teammate (even though he or she may suck or be a douchebag). Take the classy way out and surrender (even if they do no want to). BUT all our discussion goes to shit if Relic does not implement any system for penalizing afkers, leavers, etc. In: Lobby
Thread: Game leavers23 Sep 2014, 04:32 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2014, 04:27 AMGreeb I don't have any problem with people leaving the game. Forcing players to play when they don't want will only make that they will avoid CoH2 and play anything else. If I play a game and my random teammate starts making 5 fuel caches without making any troops then I leave. If I can't tell my partner strategy and he doesn't even speak english, I leave too. If I consider that the game is lost and my teammate doesn't want surrender, I leave. Etc. Why should I be forced to play a game that I don't like or enjoy? Of course it feels terrible to play a lost game. I would just leave as well. However, I think players can "abuse" this mindset. People leave after losing the first engagement, losing vp, fuel, etc. I seen players leave for the smallest of things. I think there's a fine line between leaving because there is no more hope, and fighting it out In: Lobby
Thread: Game leavers23 Sep 2014, 04:05 AM I think both is bad: forcing to play a losing game and getting penalized for leaving when the game is lost. There has to be a middle ground where you can safely leave the game In: Lobby
Thread: IS-2 Secure Mode22 Sep 2014, 21:57 PM This is a bad ability, especially on a heavy tank like the IS2. Get rid of this!!!! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is OKW the strongest faction currently?22 Sep 2014, 21:52 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2014, 21:46 PMRomeo yes I remember when they took off the munitions penalty. What was it, 66 percent back to normal? I thought that was a significant change! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Mines and Munitions22 Sep 2014, 21:01 PM Ohhh so that is why I keep floating ammo.....(runs off to plant more mines) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My Epiphany22 Sep 2014, 20:49 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2014, 20:42 PMscratchedpaintjob yes, 3v3s and 4v4s are unbalanced. but balancing units for these gamemodes would ruin the 1v1 and 2v2 balance completely, as other people have pointed out. while mostly playing 2v2, i understand the players, who want to play large teamgames . probably the easiest way to better the balance would be, to reduce axis fuel income after a certain minute by a certain percent for 3v3s and 4v4s. this would better the balance by quite a bit, at least in my opinion, because it would prevent or delay the axis tank spam. other than that, i dont think that there are easy ways to do it. While that may be a good solution, I don't want it to be like "you are playing axis, here is this penalty for you!" type of thing In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Would COH2.org hold a 4vs4 tournement ?22 Sep 2014, 20:10 PM Yes!!! a 4v4 with all the top players!!! I would definitely watch! In: Lobby