Profile of NinjaWJ

SPs are very strong already. Flamethrowers are a good way to deal with tough infantry. It is already fairly risky option because the flame unit must get close to do damage, and have a chance of the tnak exploding

I don't care how favored people say okw is. That low of a fuel income is such a late game hindrance. Maybe if allied players would stop having manpower battles with obs and instead having fuel battles against panthers they wouldn't complain about how shitty the match up is. Sorry this isn't vcoh where rifles with bars isn't a viable strategy against everything.

This is an overgeneralization. Most 4v4 games end up being late game armor battles. Don't forget, Axis armor is a lot better than Allied when compared pound for pound.

You allie fanboys are just cherry pickers. Here's likewise a replay where a ally team came back after only being left with 22 points. Against good players.

•  
  

  3

  VS

  .:PSG:. RedxWings Romeo

  L E M O N ? Dr.destynova

  Close 2v2 between pr0s

  by: Romeo map: Rails and Metal

  5

  -

Comebacks happen to both sides, it's what makes the game so interesting.

I once lost a game with 1 point left, I ticked down from 500.

If you allow comebacks, then only because you were overextending while forgetting to fortify your position with mines, healthy back up squads and the lack of counters.

you are cherry picking as well.... No one is saying that comebacks shouldn't happen. It just seems that it is much easier to come back in a game as Axis.

Now this is an exagerration.

You would be surprised. If the Allied team isn't pushing into the Axis base at ~20min or has anything less than 70-8- percent map control, you can expect probably one KT or Tiger coming

Note: I am primarily an Allied 4v4 AT player

Me and my teammates win most of our games, but some of the losses are particularly infuriating. This has been a pretty frustrating experience for me. I often feel like i'm defeating my enemy by inflicting casualties, squad wipes, destroying vehicles, etc. My team generally does very well in maintaining map control. We can hold VPs for a long time, and take control of the vital resources in most of our games. However, if we don't force our opponent to rage quit or break our opponent, it becomes a tremendous uphill battle

Even forceing a stalemate is dangerous for the Allies because once the first Panther rolls out, it can quickly turn the tide against the Allies. The game gets exponentially more difficult when Elefants, Tigers, KTs, and Jagdtigers roll into the battlefield.

When i play Axis, i feel that if i hold at least 40-50 percent of the map, i can still win in the late game. Once the first Panther rolls out, I can reverse most of the defeats and start pushing back my opponent. The game is a lot more fun, and less stressful. I can make some mistakes and still win, whereas making a mistake in the early and mid-game is costly when playing as Allies.

I wonder how many games are won by the Axis late game when they were "losing" most of the match. What do you guys think? I would love to hear everyone's opinions on this.

OMG THIS IS WONDERFUL

I am so sad.... those poor engies..