Profile of kingdun3284

Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2017, 12:22 PMLeo251

Oh man, leave OST alone. They are the waekest faction by far, and you are whinnin about a mortar?? are you OK?

Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2017, 12:07 PMLoxley

In your video, there was no model killed with the 1st shot. 4 men still alive after 1st shot, but their hitpoints are reduced. The second hit kills them.

This can happen all the time, it can be that already in 1 hit all are dead, or that the mortar misses all the time and hit nothing.

No need to call it a cheat and create youtube videos with "cheating mortar" in it.

Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2017, 10:14 AMWilliam Christensen

Well, originally, the Ostheer mortar was created to take on 6-man squads of the Soviet. That's why it has rather good accuracy cause if it doesn't back then, why would anyone bother get it. Same go with Soviet mortar, it was created to take on 4-man squads of the Ostheer, so it has worse accuracy cause if it has the same accuracy as Ostheer mortar, it will completely annihilate Ostheer infantries (That's why USF mortar was such a powerful weapon despite being the exact same copy of the Ostheer mortar: It was because the enemy they fight against, rathar itself). The case with Brits will basically the same as how USF mortar perform towards Ostheer (4-man squads being attack by mortar designed to take on larger squad size).

In all honesty, the USF mortar should been the copy of the Soviet mortar, not the Ostheer one due to reasons above (The majority of both Ostheer and OKW infantry-based units are 4-man squads). Meanwhile, the situation with how Ostheer mortar perform toward Brits infantries is more tricky since Ostheer mortar perform fine and balance towards USF and Soviet (The majority of these two armies are 5-man and 6-man squads) but not the same early on with Brits (Later on they get 5-man for the majority of their troops, but early on quite problematic). In this case, I guess cope with it?‎
‎

Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2017, 14:59 PMAngrade (Ægion)

Here is a quick poll. I have always found it weird that grenadiers were always locked behind a building. Ostheer loses a bit map control in seeing that they have to tech into a building for their standard infantry. Soviets can always build later for support weapons, while USF, UKF, and start with infantry and support weapons in there initial building. While their teching is expensive but they do not lose out on early map control from being able to rush towards a favored building. My suggestion is that swap the position of the MG 42 and the Grenadier. Panzerfausts would still require the building however.