Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: Cyberbullying Legislation In Poland28 Aug 2016, 05:26 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2016, 00:03 AMBasilone Stop with the self promotional "I'm prominent person" talking points and you'll win more people over. Theres several of us on this site that used to stream a lot and had similar viewership when the streaming scene was 5% what it is today, and frankly we aren't that impressed. This isn't an ewok camp, and you're not C3P0; no special treatment. lol you have a serious problem with your ego. I know some people speak a the 3rd of the singular, but you speak at the 1st of plurial. How many people are you in your head? In: Lobby
Thread: Cyberbullying Legislation In Poland27 Aug 2016, 13:09 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2016, 11:43 AMferwiner Well, support is too much to say, there is no support from my side, I just fail to see any problem with what he does. Come on, this is war game community, not kindergarden, nobody should cry when offended. This where you are wrong, people have right to cry when offended. This is not yours or mine to say nothing happens, be strong, that's just a troll so shut up. Countries have laws to deal with this kind of situation for a good reasons, being on internet doesn't mean the laws suddenly disappear. And yes, you are giving 100% support with your attitude. Just think once, if Wada decides to do something terrible wrong with himself -because you can't say that never going to happen you are not in his head after all, the police will take the forum logs as evidence and what will they see: they'll see a bunch of guys who didn't help, who minored the issue, who reported the fault over Wada himself etc... Seems ridiculous? maybe because you never faced such situation before. You can be charge for your comments. In: Lobby
Thread: Cyberbullying Legislation In Poland27 Aug 2016, 11:32 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2016, 11:07 AMferwiner Through the years Barton managed to troll so many people in this community its not even possible to count them. In fact, wada is the first that can't cope with it, you can answer yourself who seems to be more problematic then. Barton, everytime. There are two sad things in this story, Barton still harassing random people after son many years and other people responding that's not a problem, giving full support to his behavior. In: Lobby
Thread: Armor Company vs Rifle Company25 Aug 2016, 07:31 AM Flares are good combined with Scott and Jackson, See flares as a munitions trade for MP. You lose less models. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: move stug to tier 2.5?24 Aug 2016, 11:51 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2016, 11:14 AMMr.Smith Another idea could be to give the 2.5 Stug a debuff, for as long as the T3 is not up: - Make the TWP ability unavailable - Reduce Stug damage from 160 to 120 (same as SU-76 / Puma / AEC) (maybe penetration too?) The debuff will go away the moment the OST player actually builds the T3. The idea is that, although OST does need an anti-light vehicle counter to anti-cheese itself from the 222, the Stug is a god, and it shouldn't be handed down so easily. I don't really like Stug on T2.5, stug is a pure AT unit that deal close to no damage to infantry and it has too much armor at this stage of the game. It is like a pack on wheel but with a fuel cost. This idea will completely shutdown Ostheer T3 play. And nerfing it in exchange, well what do you want to nerf? Damage = will be back to the list of useless unit. Armor, you can already circle it quite easily. Imo, Relic should remove the 222, put back the original scout car with no upgrade, dedicated to give vision and kill snipers. And add the panzerIII like many suggested before, the PanzerIII should be something equivalent to the Stuart, deal damage but not too much. Or simply nerf T-70 and Stuart damage vs infantry. imo, as option: nerfing accuracy on the move would do great. Nerfing acceleration speed so it become much more difficult to kite squads. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Game feels dead23 Aug 2016, 12:47 PM They need to capitalize on the new warspoil system. And this is what they are doing with the warpaint contest. they have to make people spend they in-game money much faster so they never have enough to buy new stuff thus spend real money in it. But that's going to be hard now, they are missing a lot of content available with in-game money. Actually the game lacks a lot of personalization, aka in-game IU, menu IU, loading screen, model skins, unique tank models etc... What baffle me the most is that it seems they didn't learn anything from COHO. COHO had good features that need to be polish and improve and that could have been added into COH2. Ie: Concept of "elite" stock unit was great, they were too much overbuff and brought a lot of unbalance but the concept of having a unique model(skin) of one of your stock unit was cool. this could have been develop and not necessarily with the buff/bonus, just the skin that you can win or buy and apply to 1 of your panther/sherman/cromwell whatever, you lose the tank ingame, you have to pay ingame money to be able to use it again creating a money sink. IMO, those features are what retain a lot of players, cool skins, some more multiplayer achievements, things to raise your e-penis are what retain players. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 10:53 AMmortiferum My point did not change. Charging 2 MG from the front with a dense blob should be punished by suppression/ pin. Using flanking, or spreading forces out should be encouraged, not have them as dense as possible, especially with late game LMG "blobs" which can sniper gunners out even while MG is in green cover. They pushed back the Ostwind while suppressed as well. There were 2 MG, an Ostwind, and a P4. The "blob" was suppressed. Neither the P-4 nor the ostwind caused sufficient casualties before Ostwind was pushed back by AT rifle guards (which were suppressed). PS: Ostwind was not lost, but also embarrassingly ineffective against something it should counter, infantry. Post the replay cuz its hardly difficult to believe. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 10:51 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 10:18 AMmortiferum You are right, defining a blob and turning it into useful code will be hard since relic.... yeah, 2 squads would get counted as blobbing... Would increasing the MG's suppression radius work? Since the issue here are that MG seems to be unable to suppress more than 1-2 unit at a time even if they are clumped up rather close to each other from time to time. The issue is your perception of blobbing. Why would you be able to stop 7 squads with 1? where are your 6 other squads? Do you complain that a single pak will lose vs 4-5 shermans? even if they stay in front on it. You have a HMG42, is coming 7 squads in front of it, one burst isn't enough to suppress them = hit the retreat button and come back stronger. Next time, you'll support your HMG with something else. The action you described earlier, losing a ostwind to a blob of 7 guards is symptomatic of a lack of discernment in game. Do you see a sherman going into 7 squads of SP+shreck leaving the fight alive? Or the same ostwind into 7 squads of RM+Zooks winning the fight? Some of the good answers are to kite them, to bait them into heavier fire. Spread your troop etc... You did something that didn't work, you lost, take the lesson as experience. You also probably did something wrong before that, letting someone getting 7 squads of guards roaming in the battlefield isn't normal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 08:36 AMmortiferum No longer have replay, but would you consider 7 squads of guards, all standing so close that unit cards essentially overlap each other and having little space in between as "blob"? I thought you were the troll, since I mentioned the numbers before. Not asking you how many squads were facing you, but the definition of a blob with numbers. How much squads at minimum to consider it as a blob? What minimum and maximum radius to say they are blobbing? Are static squads considerate as a blob? You know, something that can be translated as parameter in the game. Let's assume 3 squads is a blob, since many people around here are considering it in the many threads we had about it. If I have a HMG42+pio+Gren in the minimum radius not firing in the same direction, do I blob? If I have a HMG42 in an house, a pio squad next to give vision and a mortar just behind, do I blob? If I have 3 RM squads in green cover behind the cemetery wall in Semoisky, do I blob? If I have 3 Volks squads passing the south left bridge at the same time on Semoisky, do I blob? If I have a sniper, a pio to give vision and a gren next by to counter flank, do I blob? If I have 3 RM squads flanking and closing the distance on an house with a HMG42, going into your blobbing definition radius, Do I blob? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Punish blobs with received accuracy penalty22 Aug 2016, 07:05 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2016, 06:52 AMmortiferum Does this help you imagine what a blob looks like? xD Not really, but it proves you don't have a single clue either. Be glad and find me a definition with valid numbers instead of a trollpic. In: COH2 Balance