Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog21 Nov 2018, 08:22 AM Airborne Doctrine The following changes have been made to Airborne as the doctrine faced borderline irrelevance in this new tech structure. Both weapon drops should represent an attractive choice for players using a full LT or CPT build. The munition cost should prohibit weapon drop spam in team games. -50 cal HMG now costs 125 manpower - 60 munitions -57mm ATG now costs 125 manpower - 75 munitions. Now comes at 3cp -Pathfinders available from 0cp Why don't you simply put them a 200mp each. You're not making this doctrine anymore viable by making it heavy munition sink. The only thing in it that doesn't cost/need munition are Pathfinder... Just a question, why not dissociating the M20 from T1 and put it at T0 available when first officer hit the field. At the moment I see close to 0 reason to build captain first on 1vs1, the lieutenant got all the pressuring stuff while the captain is relegated to be a kind of support tier in team game. Having the M20 would make it more appealing in any game mode. Nice to see that finally USF get CP from teching, M8 is maybe going to hit the field before the sherman now... In: Lobby
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog20 Nov 2018, 19:49 PM I hardly see the benefice to tech weapon rack before at least having 60 munition but I can see something about grenade being more accessible. In: Lobby
Thread: 5cp for M8 is too late 20 Nov 2018, 19:28 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2018, 18:16 PMblvckdream Yeah Greyhound comes way too late. And it feels even more useless with the USF revamp mod, just no need for it when you have all these stock tools available. Not sure, he may still have a role if you don't upgrade your tiers to unlock Lvs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Two approaches for faction design19 Nov 2018, 15:55 PM So when it comes to the argument of Riflemen, you're first to say they don't need smoke back if we remove the mortar because other mainline infantry don't have it, but when it comes to the brummbar we easily turn your argumentation the opposite way. Uniqueness and faction design seems to be an argument only when it serves your ~~logic~~ argumentation. In: Lobby
Thread: USF is trash in every mode and in every way change my mind19 Nov 2018, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2018, 13:20 PMullumulu There is a good chance that the AAHT will kill the crew from rakten befor it can kill the ht Lol show us one footage, only one is enough. Of course with the AAHT in the raketen cone of fire. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: EA will remaster the first two 'Command & Conquer'19 Nov 2018, 12:40 PM They´ll need more than a remaster to make C&C1 interesting to play today. They would have say a reboot with new design, I would have had some hype but even if I slept hundred of hundred of hours on the original when I was 14, today the game mechanism and design is just out of date. In: Other Games
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog19 Nov 2018, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2018, 09:29 AMsherlock No, you can't do the 3rd option, because you'd float manpower. And that's exactly why I said Lt should be 20 fuel and the 10 fuel put into the unlock tech for light vehicles My bad, I read the opposite, sorry! In: Lobby
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog19 Nov 2018, 09:20 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2018, 08:54 AMsherlock The idea is to have the fuel low enough that it can be 2 rifles, lt, mg for example. If it is 30 fuel you are floating so much manpower that you will go a 3rd rifle because you don't want to float 400+ manpower until you have enough fuel to get the lieutenant. Manpower is not the restricting factor at that point. Captain for 20 could be something to look at as well, my comment was more concerning the fact that usf basically always has to go 3 rifles before getting an officer currently. 30 fuel from a timing perspective is still not enough to change that because even with perfect capping you are floating manpower, so 3 rifles would still be the automatic result. 20 fuel is low enough to allow for 2 rifles and then lt, mg. What do you mean with "you can both"? 3 rifles, lt; 3 rifles, cpt; 2 rifles, lt, mg are still more different build order options than 3 rifles, lt; 3 rifles, cpt In the mod, you can do 2xRE + 2xRM 3xRM + Lieutenant 2xRM + Lieutenant + 1xRM or anything else such as mortar, HMG or Pathfinder. There is also the grenade unlock, I haven't tested it but grenade before lieutenant is also a consideration. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog19 Nov 2018, 07:45 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2018, 06:06 AMsherlock I like the mod a lot, it's similar to the one I did earlier this month. Timing: Personally, I'd make lieutenant 20 fuel since it allows to directly tech lieutenant after the 2nd rifle. Put the 10 fuel in the unlock tech instead. Is the price higher than 20 then people are still forced into a 3rd rifle and no real diversification in build is achieved since reaching 30 fuel takes too long to sit on that much manpower to stall for lieutenant instead of going another rifle. Isn't the opposite? if you make the lieutenant 20 fuel, everyone is going to do 3xRM into lieutenant. As it is in the mod, you can do both. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog18 Nov 2018, 17:09 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Nov 2018, 14:53 PMVipper Why? do other mainline infantries have it? Do all mainline infantry have passive or active healing, do all mainline infantry upgrade on the field etc... I was expecting better from you. In: Lobby