+ to Ciez and Dangerous-Cloth.
I dont trust Relic after there bad work with coh2. I can undestand a lot DLC (its okey, game make for money), but not bad support, slow balance fix, broken optimizations, OP factions/docs for money. Relic make unfinished games.
The thing that people usually overlook is that, you CAN make shit ton of DLC (Skins/commanders), but not necessarily need to make that Pay2win for people to buy it. |
I don't trust Relic as a company. Unfortunately I almost don't trust any company in the gaming industry anymore. Not only have the dlc milking scams gone up intensively since the first time one went up in 2006 in Elder Scrolls, but the games that come out are now buggy, unfinished and definite beta builds in most cases. Most companies know they can get away with patching a game after launch no matter how broken it is.
Relic has become a cash grabbing company that milks every franchise it still has, it is obvious. They launch obvious completely broken dlc in an online real time strategy game that has good balance as one of its central pillars and proceed to not hot fix it for months. The only company I still trust is CD Projekt Red.
Paradox Interactive?  |
Can somebody shorten the article into 3-5 sentences without breaking his meaning and also keeping it polite ?
Thanks, I´m too bored to read that wall of a text
I read a couple paragraphs and saw how long my scroll bar is, and gave up  |
It's not really smart to use that tank as damage sponge though, especially against OKW. It's free exp.
OKW tanks and reketen still takes forever to vet up. (maybe except JP4, but i remember they raised the exp requirement) |
people really underestimates churchill, but that's because their AT capabilities aren't that great as comets, it's a typical "tank" role, to hold out enemy, take damage and so on, churchill is really hard to get destroyed
because people expect to run their churchill in and wipe everything like pre-nerf Croc or Comet. |
|
Post update, crash remains.
clean reinstalled the game, the same. |
For exactly that reason I don´t get why some people even build the T-34/85. The T-34/76 is way more cost efficient and the 85mm gun still doesn´t offer that much more. Both tanks usually need to flank. Yet you get a lot more T-34/76s for the cost.
85 gun does much better wiping inf with their AoE, couple that with the MG |
Randumb 2v2, 300 loss for each player.
Now that's a meat grinder you dont usually see.
 |
I don't need hundreds of samples to see there's something odd about soviets losing 7 out of 8 games against Ostheer and 14 out of 19 against OKW.
one possible explanation - karma is a bitch? |
Currently Ostheer is joke. Because of popcap. Right now you cannot have 2 pios, 3 fighting squads at guns, mg and 3 tanks.
Why ? Because their infantry eats more popcap than tanks (stug - 8 popcap, pgrens - 9, pak ~ 7).
I think lovering the popcap for infanry and increasing popcap for tanks is the way to go
(Right now ostheer will have bigger army if they go 2 infantry squads and full tanks than support weapons, infantry and 2 tanks,  )
add 4 men squad to your list, and after artillery become dominant, you got yourself a pure pioneer+tanks ostheer army |
Hong Kong
Relic Entertainment
