Profile of ComradeCipher

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 31

General Information
Steam: 76561198006788566


Thread: Fighting Positions14 Jul 2014, 04:43 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2014, 04:07 AMDullahan Is the DPS really that much better than the regular bar though? The ability always seemed like the reason to get it on riflemen. Yup need to see stats on this as well! In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Fighting Positions13 Jul 2014, 00:24 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2014, 15:40 PMDerWeisseHahn Pretty sure only riflemen get defensive stance . Plus, I really want to give RE's 1919's (and zooks) but a stiff breeze can cause them to perish. 1919's + vet OKW infantry = This Shame, but is it then possible for riflemen to 'defensive stance' while in a fighting position? That'd at least let the FP without MG become a teensy bit more useful. Also, when I see Obersoldaten that picture comes to mind O_O In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: CieZ's Captain Opener13 Jul 2014, 00:19 AM I've seen it in both 1v1 and 2v2 but I think I've witnessed it more in 2v2 games, at least on maps with a lot of open fields like Langreskaya. I suppose that I've just been putting bars on them because I find that it makes them better combatants at mid and close range as the rate of fire of the BAR helps if the enemy is recklessly charging in some troops in the open. With vet, I've had a pathfinder squad that just wrecked infantry and won out against an MG a couple of times in direct combat (while in green cover of course) I don't think that they sub out the actual 'sniper' rifles the pathfinders have though In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: CieZ's Captain Opener12 Jul 2014, 08:46 AM I've seen some players i've fought against using a similar strat to yours, but interestingly enough they forego building a second rifleman squad and stick to getting one or two RE's after the first rifleman and floating to get two pathfinder squads ASAP. I personally think getting a second rifleman is better than two RE's but dual pathfinder with dual bars each is pretty impressive when vetted In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Fighting Positions12 Jul 2014, 08:43 AM Actually, I realize that its for strategies like this that Engineer Vet adds another squad member RE's with m1919's and defensive stance anyone? (also, unsure if they can even get defensive stance ) In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: CieZ's Captain Opener11 Jul 2014, 06:24 AM CieZ, what's your opinion on grabbing nades at some point early in the game? I've been finding the nade upgrade is more useful for dealing with MG's (smoke and flanks, the usual), but most skilled players can predict and dodge grenades In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: T4: What to build?11 Jul 2014, 06:22 AM Yeah the smoke barrage is a super useful ability, if only I remembered to use it most of the time ;P In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Fighting Positions11 Jul 2014, 06:21 AM Besides the point of this post but Dullahan could you elaborate on the 'No Rifleman' builds? I'm curious and I don't think i've seen anyone actually try em In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: What did I do wrong here?11 Jul 2014, 06:17 AM Hey I can't seem to open up your replay in game In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: What did I do wrong here?10 Jul 2014, 08:34 AM I'll have a look sometime tonight or tomorrow In: US Forces Strategies