|
GG from south.. |
Alt-F4, the new win meta  |
In several games vs this guy (DJ-Hazard), he caused sync errors, when losing.
Screenshot
|
how many snipers(good players) have you killed with M3
and if I build T1 (which I don't like to do) to control a sniper, I'd better build my sniper (for the long run)
I only answered, because U meant, U need something "to control" the ostsnipers.
Soviet sniper team will always win vs ostsniper, and in a situation, where M3 and 222 can chase a sniper or other units, the M3 does better. It kills much models while the 222 is only testing its gun vs stones on the road.
And U say U don't like to build T1, ok. As ostplayer I have to build T1 and T2, so why should the soviet player only need to build T2. |
If you improve the 222 to fight snipers, Let's improve on anything and soviet against snipers? I personally am not a fan of the game in T1, I must now, suffer the whole game? I also want something(like improve 222) for controlling the snipers ost
Cheap M3 kills Ost Sniper better than 222 with 2cm gun and MG 34 trying to kill a soviet sniper. |
If you asking yourself who is Daryl Dixon:
--> (◣╬◢) Loxley
I do now what you couldn't do after all ur defeats:
Writing
GG wp (in forest) |
You dont NEED to take on the Jackson, like I keep saying, if you find a way to beat his infantry hands down without using any front line tanks, you can as good as ignore the Jackson if you like because it cant do squat to your inf.
If you use all Osts anti inf tools you can beat USA infantry.
Maybe in 1on1, when the USF player does not build any other tanks than jacksons. If he builds Sherman too, or Scott, you need own tanks. Only infantry will be a welcome aim for allied arty.
In teamgames, when there are T34 and other stuff, you need own tanks too, so you will NEED to take on the Jackons.
|
|
At the moment it does not justify its high costs. |
What are you even trying to say? Of the entire post you made not even 1 word makes sense. Anyway we will see how the custom works out, if you have the balls to accept .
You wrote:
1) we where experimenting with buildorders
2) you won very close on vps even though we didn't played on our best.
John pointed out, that it were normal buildorders and not very close on vp (453:0), so what is so hard to understand ?
You are like the opponents of the boxer Klitschko, who lost all the time vs them, and then said: I want to fight again, last time, my shoe lace was open, but this time I will win. |
|
I was not participant of this game, but I like to answer.
1. Your fault, if you start experimenting vs good players. When I play vs SoE for example, I dont't start to try something unusual, you can do this when u play vs mid skilled players.
2. No one plays always his best, everyone has a bad game from time to time.
3. I know that Sinister and Yoker have not the best computers and they experience lags too, especially on big maps with many units, and when the game is very long (like 1 hour), but when we lose, I have never seen that they write, it was because of the lags.
4. Stop asking for arranged games all the time, our clan has won most of the last matches, all on different maps (Essen, La Gleize, Redball, Rhine) with no preparation for the games, just ranked games. So what do you want to prove ? That you can win a game on a special map with fixed positions and well prepared and trained on this map ?
Should we play game after game, until you win 1 time, so you can say: look, they are bad, we have won vs them. |
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
