Posts: 1794
The tanks mentioned in this article are all heavy class or equivalent tanks. And heavy class is, of course, difficult to penetrate.
Posts: 1979
More i think of this. More i like it as a quick fix.
Sure Vipper have thrown more holstic suggestions with P4 and 60TD, i also made other suggestions.
But at this stage, as spoken by sanders, Relic does not want more effort into the game. So a HEAT rounds seems like a good balance. We already see Okw perform with it and i doubt any objections to 'HEAT'. get "it" hehe
Posts: 1794
Posts: 1979
Does not helps with pen/late game issue at all.
And what would a light tank achieve?
Besides admitting Wehr infantry/team weapons/support/static design is weak, has been weak for many moons since the power creep?
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1979
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
What IF, we swap vet2/vet3 on the Stug.
Give the higher Rof boost and mobility sooner and leave the armor (which is mostly irrelevant for the Stug) and smaller RoF as vet 3.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Why not turn the armor buff into a health one while we're at it? In vet 3
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
If the vet is swapped you could. Replacing the armor gained with +160HP, making it go from 560HP > 720HP would make it more survivable than making it have PIV levels of armor.
Posts: 2358
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Panther frontal armor was the only feature of it and now it's like it doesnt exists, because of the high pen of allied TD but also the mediums pen buffs to fight P4s.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Here i come with which i hope, is the only sensible idea in this nightmare sea of convoluted and exaggerated POVs.
The PV is fine.
The pak is fine.
What IF, we swap vet2/vet3 on the Stug.
Give the higher Rof boost and mobility sooner and leave the armor (which is mostly irrelevant for the Stug) and smaller RoF as vet 3.
Posts: 2358
It has 960 health and its armor is still 100 better than any allied medium tank. 50 range also still gives a huge advantage over any medium on top of those things
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
I understand what you say, but you must also post the allied tanks pen to turn those armor values into %pen at different ranges. That coupled with in game dynamics and economy, therefore becomes a very complex equation.
Posts: 1979
I understand what you say, but you must also post the allied tanks pen to turn those armor values into %pen at different ranges. That coupled with in game dynamics and economy, therefore becomes a very complex equation.
But to summarize, In game footage proves panthers are lagging behind.
Posts: 2358
What? No allied stock medium can take on a panther 2v1 frontally...
Allied premium mediums stand a better chance but are still more likely to lose in a frontal 2v1
The only real counter thus far are the heavy tank destroyers... and theyre SUPPOSED to be the counter
 |
|
|
37 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
47 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
