How are Infantrysections since patch?

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:50 PMKirrik

This kind of thing tends to happen when you nuke every single crutch unit to compensate for terminator infantry killing everything and then nerf said terminator infantry without reverting previous nerfs to things like UC, Cromwells, Tank hunter IS, Land matress etc.

Gotta love picking Lend Lease all the time to deal with assgrens and MG spam on chokes, very rewarding gameplay.

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:52 PMT.R. Stormjäger

No, the UC armour nerf was absolutely well deserved and should never be reverted.

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:56 PMSupport Sapper

How about an armor upgrade like the m20 which allow troops fire from inside the vehicle ? Require platoon Cp. The stock Uc from T1 will still come out like current.

Or, move UC to T2 and add a fuel cost ?

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 16:04 PMT.R. Stormjäger

I don’t care, as long as the 7 armour UC stays the hell away from the game.

Having to account for the broken sections as well as the untouchable from small arms fire UC at the start of the game was a nightmare, and the only counter was to build a raketen AFTER you encounter the UC, because preemptively getting one destroyed your early game if the Brit didn’t build one.

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 16:20 PMSupport Sapper

Calm down, dude, I'm not asking for 7 armor UC And sections are no more broken now, aren't they ?

All i was proposing is a smoke discharger and/or an armor upgrade at T2.

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 16:33 PMT.R. Stormjäger

I was referring to Kirik who complained about the original UC nerf.

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 22:53 PMachpawel

But UKF is better than ostheer

Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:02 PMLago

UKF was bad Ostheer with 280 man super soldiers that blew up any CQC units by tossing grenades at their own feet.

Now they're just bad Ostheer.

I think the Balance Team needs to decide how they're intended to be played, and then give them the tools to do that effectively.

Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 02:45 AMSupport Sapper

How ._.

Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 17:10 PMachpawel

The whole faction is designed around all concepts that were asked for by ostheer players and rejected (close range grenade, 5th stock man gren squads, ability to build sandbags, heavy stock tanks, etc.)

Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 17:10 PMachpawel

The whole faction is designed around all concepts that were asked for by ostheer players and rejected (close range grenade, 5th stock man gren squads, ability to build sandbags, heavy stock tanks, etc.)

Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:30 PMSupport Sapper

Typical "grass is greener on the other side".

Infantry sections's nade had a minimum range now and it is standard frag, ost have nuke nade with no minimum range on a cqb specialist which can be built from T0.

Sandbags can be built by pio, which also come from T0 so stop pretending thay ost cant get access to them.



Edit: Like some lad above said, UKF use to be worse ost with infantry sections as an exception, now they just be bad ost.

Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:35 PMKatitof

And yet, your win ratio with them is exactly the same as with any other faction you play.
In fact, your playercard proves that game is perfectly balanced for average player.

Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2019, 18:38 PMachpawel

Jeeez - I'm like 200-400 UKF player in 1v1 without using shotcuts on the keyboard. And I'm a total noob not using any meta with them. Trust me - they are much better than ost.

But to the ponit - they really have everything ost player have always wanted.