Move Luchs to T2,increase Luchs sight to 50,and increase fuel to 65,build time to 70s
Move 251 flak HT to T3,reduce fuel cost to 45
Now OKW T3 still more competitive than T2,and Luchs in OKW T3 not important like puma and walking stuka
Exchange Flak HT and Luchs in OKW tech tree?
16 Sep 2019, 06:45 AM
#1
Posts: 731
16 Sep 2019, 07:06 AM
#2
Posts: 48
Move Luchs to T2,increase Luchs sight to 50,and increase fuel to 65,build time to 70s
Move 251 flak HT to T3,reduce fuel cost to 45
Now OKW T3 still more competitive than T2,and Luchs in OKW T3 not important like puma and walking stuka
As an okw player i must say that would be not good. Luchs need support of puma
16 Sep 2019, 10:49 AM
#3
Posts: 783
How is this even a good idea?
16 Sep 2019, 15:21 PM
#4
Posts: 2358
Early flakHT wstuka and raketen is simply stupid OP. So no by any means
16 Sep 2019, 15:53 PM
#5
Posts: 3260
It's an interesting idea.
Flak HT/Puma/Stuka's a solid tier: quick shock vehicle that shuts down infantry hard and a Puma to defend it. It's less mobile than the Luchs build, but definitely stronger at defending its turf. You'd almost certainly need an AT gun to fight that combo.
As for if the Luchs is a good replacement for the Flak HT? That's harder. It's certainly more capable against LVs than the Flak HT, but it's vulnerable to AT infantry in a way the Flak HT isn't.
Flak HT/Puma/Stuka's a solid tier: quick shock vehicle that shuts down infantry hard and a Puma to defend it. It's less mobile than the Luchs build, but definitely stronger at defending its turf. You'd almost certainly need an AT gun to fight that combo.
As for if the Luchs is a good replacement for the Flak HT? That's harder. It's certainly more capable against LVs than the Flak HT, but it's vulnerable to AT infantry in a way the Flak HT isn't.
17 Sep 2019, 03:09 AM
#6
Posts: 2358
Luchs on BgHQ could use a trade buff, less mobility and more armor.
Less hunting and wiping potential, more infantry support role, to fight off garrisons, HMGs and a scout car.
Basically the same as a LeiG but with tracks.
Less hunting and wiping potential, more infantry support role, to fight off garrisons, HMGs and a scout car.
Basically the same as a LeiG but with tracks.
17 Sep 2019, 04:03 AM
#7
1
Posts: 169
This would likely have very little impact as most players would probably just learn how to use the flak halftrack and still skip Battlegroup. You would likely achieve a lot more by putting the Puma in the main HQ and requiring either the Battlegroup or Mechanized HQs to be alive.
17 Sep 2019, 11:02 AM
#8
Posts: 783
FHT just needs to do better in order for the Battlegroup to even be as viable.
-Increase Surpression
-Increase Accuracy
Since both of these are relatively bad.
Switching FHT with another unit will only only make things worse.
-Increase Surpression
-Increase Accuracy
Since both of these are relatively bad.
Switching FHT with another unit will only only make things worse.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
572 users are online:
572 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49061
Welcome our newest member, Rihedcfrd
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Rihedcfrd
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM