Are bushes directional or omnidirectional cover?
25 Jul 2019, 14:19 PM
#1
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Question in title
25 Jul 2019, 14:38 PM
#2
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
I did a few tests some time ago, which lead me to believe bushes and some wooden fences are omnidirectional while things like boxes and crates are directional. What is and what isn't seems to be a bit inconsistent though.
25 Jul 2019, 20:19 PM
#3
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedI did a few tests some time ago, which lead me to believe bushes and some wooden fences are omnidirectional while things like boxes and crates are directional. What is and what isn't seems to be a bit inconsistent though.
I had a sneaking suspicion not all yellow cover was created equal. I'm gonna guess craters are non-directional and dragons teeth are directional?
26 Jul 2019, 03:34 AM
#4
Posts: 2742
It has always been my understanding that only terrain cover is omnidirectional. Object based cover is directional because entities and projectiles are interacting with the object. However I believe bushes to be effectively omnidirectional because infantry can walk inside of their hitboxes.
However, if infantry are standing up against a bushrow and not inside of it, I think they are vulnerable to a flank.
However, if infantry are standing up against a bushrow and not inside of it, I think they are vulnerable to a flank.
26 Jul 2019, 20:36 PM
#5
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
You can't always control where your squad stands on bushes which is the problem. If they are directional cover that makes fighting from bushes extremely frustrating.
26 Jul 2019, 20:42 PM
#6
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
I did a few tests some time ago, which lead me to believe bushes and some wooden fences are omnidirectional while things like boxes and crates are directional. What is and what isn't seems to be a bit inconsistent though.
Can you elaborate on how you did these tests?
You can't always control where your squad stands on bushes which is the problem. If they are directional cover that makes fighting from bushes extremely frustrating.
That's one of the reasons why I asked, it would be a bit awkward if bushes are directional.
26 Jul 2019, 21:01 PM
#7
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Can you elaborate on how you did these tests?
Nothing comprehensive. I just put a squad of Cons in some places and had an Obers LMG firing at them to note (considerable) differences in TTK.
Below are the results if I remember correctly, with the yellow lines actually giving the RA bonus (so omnidirectional) while orange didn't give any RA bonus (so directional).
26 Jul 2019, 21:11 PM
#8
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Nothing comprehensive. I just put a squad of Cons in some places and had an Obers LMG firing at them to note (considerable) differences in TTK.
Below are the results if I remember correctly, with the yellow lines actually giving the RA bonus (so omnidirectional) while orange didn't give any RA bonus (so directional).
Thank you! I'll run a few tests myself to confirm.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
125 | |||||
104 | |||||
69 | |||||
25 | |||||
14 | |||||
13 | |||||
8 | |||||
7 | |||||
662 | |||||
32 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.921405.695+5
- 5.634229.735+8
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1237
Board Info
483 users are online:
483 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49183
Welcome our newest member, pawcoeq85
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, pawcoeq85
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM