Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
A higher range, lower damage Pak 43/17 Pounder is more area denial and less "surprise! your tank died"
Posts: 2358
Posts: 3260
Super ATGs as area denial are an excellent concept. I am quite worried about the factions that can access super ATGs, both axis factions (doctrinally) and only allied UKF as stock. On top of that its true what katitof said about simcity + super ATGs, they become annoying AF. The simpler solution to this is simply chance the "stronghold" logic of theirs and change it into a micro required skill unit.
Posts: 107
Brace given to both, but brace is changed to a lower damage reduction instead of like 80%. Something like 40%, a point where an IL2 bomb drop won't outright kill it, but may leave them with 20% HP.
Give scuttle to both emplacements so you can get rid of them and move them a bit without losing your resources or having them be so far back they're useless.
Pak43 loses transdimensional shells.
Posts: 5279
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
What damage are we talking for these guns? 240? 300? Less? 120 range might be excessive but perhaps trying 100 as a start...
 |
|
|
96 | ||
|
|
|
|
57 | ||
 |
|
|
851 | ||
 |
|
|
45 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
