<wall of text>
I could not have said it better myself!
Posts: 881
<wall of text>
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Who cares about 2v2 and up? Heck if Relic restricted those to non-mirror I wouldn't care.
Posts: 630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 35
Hey man where and what do you play?
Posts: 783 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
Lots of people? Guderian/DrHorse Seb/Contador Jim/Rainbow Symbiosis/Lollypop have all won 2v2 tournaments in case you forgot.
Posts: 55
Posts: 65
Posts: 35
Posts: 246
Posts: 55
@Feynmaniac
1. TvT is one of the favourite matchups in SC2. PvP nad ZvZ are hated, but it's due to how these factions are designed. I can imagine USvUS in vcoh as potentially interesting match-up, but what about Brits v Brits?
2. BS. I can imagine a lot of people who'd buy a game because of mirror matches, try the competitive scene and increase the competitive community. I imagine they're all called Fred.
3. Your math is bad and you should feel bad. There are 3 possible matchups in 1v1. I can imagine a lot of things for the sake of argument. In fact, I can imagine that you're wrong, and I'm right. Does that make it a fact?
Posts: 331
stuff this guy said
Posts: 1679 | Subs: 5
Posts: 55
Wall of Text
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
@Feynmaniac
3. Your math is bad and you should feel bad. There are 3 possible matchups in 1v1.
Posts: 65
Arguing that mirrors will magically make the game more competitive is silly. Good mirrors will make the game more competitive; bad mirrors, on the other hand, will drive players away.
If Relic can design factions that lend themselves to interesting and dynamic mirror matches, then mirrors should be in the game. If they can't, then mirrors shouldn't be added either.
Outside of some quasi-marketing arguments (which nobody here can make since nobody here has access to THQ's marketing and focus group materials), it comes down to pure gameplay. And because we can't discuss specifics of gameplay on these forums, any arguments one way or the other are completely baseless.
Posts: 3293
@Feynmaniac
1. TvT is one of the favourite matchups in SC2. PvP nad ZvZ are hated, but it's due to how these factions are designed. I can imagine USvUS in vcoh as potentially interesting match-up, but what about Brits v Brits?
2. BS. I can imagine a lot of people who'd buy a game because of mirror matches, try the competitive scene and increase the competitive community. I imagine they're all called Fred.
3. Your math is bad and you should feel bad. There are 3 possible matchups in 1v1. I can imagine a lot of things for the sake of argument. In fact, I can imagine that you're wrong, and I'm right. Does that make it a fact?
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Posts: 642
Anyone that says "I'll boycott the game if it has mirror matches" I really hope they don't buy the game because the multiplayer will be more enjoyable without the narrow minded morons that think everyone else should be forced to play the game the way they like it.
Deep down they know they will buy the game regardless, its just childish threats.
Posts: 93
25 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |