Login

russian armor

British base smoke barrage

28 May 2019, 18:24 PM
#41
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 May 2019, 11:14 AMLago
I don't see any harm in adding a smoke barrage to the Pyrotechnics sections. Make it free, but it still triggers the global howitzer cooldown.


+1
I think as long as it shares the cooldown there's no reason this would be asking too much
29 May 2019, 09:01 AM
#42
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 May 2019, 11:14 AMLago
I don't see any harm in adding a smoke barrage to the Pyrotechnics sections. Make it free, but it still triggers the global howitzer cooldown.


Can we cut the howitzer out? Its one of the only, already heavily limited indirect options that the brits have, making it cooldown with smoke will flat remove it from the game

Having a Pyro squad have a shared cooldown on their flare and smoke barrage seems like a fair approach, and making the smoke just arrive as a very light scattered offmap.

That way you are can use them both in a reasonable fashion, just not on a single squad.
29 May 2019, 11:15 AM
#43
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Can we cut the howitzer out? Its one of the only, already heavily limited indirect options that the brits have, making it cooldown with smoke will flat remove it from the game


How? It's literally just a buff.

Instead of just having the explosive barrage, you've got a choice between explosive or smoke.

The explosive barrage is better at displacing weapons in almost all respects, the smoke barrage is free and doesn't need to be on target.
29 May 2019, 12:48 PM
#44
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post29 May 2019, 11:15 AMLago


How? It's literally just a buff.

Instead of just having the explosive barrage, you've got a choice between explosive or smoke.

The explosive barrage is better at displacing weapons in almost all respects, the smoke barrage is free and doesn't need to be on target.


I am going to want or need smoke, for free, a hell of a lot more frequently than I need HE barrages

In addition one of the primary uses of smoke in a british army is to let a unit close in to drop an artillery flare on a position they otherwise couldn't approach

If smoke barrages trigger the cooldown the base howitzers will never be OFF cooldown to allow for normal barrages, or counter battery, or overwatch etc.


And the time it takes the base howitzers to reposition is hideoua compared to a mortar smoke drop, so an offmap would allow a much more timely response.
29 May 2019, 12:52 PM
#45
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260



I am going to want or need smoke, for free, a hell of a lot more frequently than I need HE barrages

In addition one of the primary uses of smoke in a british army is to let a unit close in to drop an artillery flare on a position they otherwise couldn't approach

If smoke barrages trigger the cooldown the base howitzers will never be OFF cooldown to allow for normal barrages, or counter battery, or overwatch etc.

And the time it takes the base howitzers to reposition is hideoua compared to a mortar smoke drop, so an offmap would allow a much more timely response.


If you're using the smoke barrage instead of the explosive barrage at every opportunity, then the smoke barrage sounds like an improvement to me.
29 May 2019, 12:57 PM
#46
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

There are actually plenty of viable solutions:
First gun could fire the Smoke barrage
Second gun could fire the HE barrage

This could fix a number of issues like the issue that currently in live HE barrage cost the same regardless if 1, 2 or Ari-bust is used.

Actually the faction is in rather good spot and once could even make the HE doctrinal or anvil/hammer only.
29 May 2019, 20:28 PM
#47
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1


And the time it takes the base howitzers to reposition is hideoua compared to a mortar smoke drop


Yeah they also have way more range. Also they buffed the rotation rate relatively recently, ever since that change ive felt they re-position fast enough
30 May 2019, 05:03 AM
#48
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

I'm against more mainline being able to do everything, even if it's with an upgrade. We tried that with rifles and it was shit design, why will it be better with Tommies? Smoke should be special not on every god damned squad, especially not every God damned 5 man squad with panzer gren target sizes and 2 lmgs and grenades and a bonus to their LOS. can we at least pretend the games health is the end same here? Vanilla factions more than make due with mortar smoke and some doctrinal options, why should the brits have it on their mainline infantry and all their generalist vehicles as well? Are Tommy Bren blobs not ba enough as is? Does nobody even pretend to give half a shit anymore?
30 May 2019, 06:37 AM
#49
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

I'm against more mainline being able to do everything, even if it's with an upgrade. We tried that with rifles and it was shit design, why will it be better with Tommies? Smoke should be special not on every god damned squad, especially not every God damned 5 man squad with panzer gren target sizes and 2 lmgs and grenades and a bonus to their LOS. can we at least pretend the games health is the end same here? Vanilla factions more than make due with mortar smoke and some doctrinal options, why should the brits have it on their mainline infantry and all their generalist vehicles as well? Are Tommy Bren blobs not ba enough as is? Does nobody even pretend to give half a shit anymore?


Rifles are also a close range squad with very high near DPS, which Tommies are not.

And the reason we have to scrape aroind for ideas of how to make this work is because of this:
Vanilla factions more than make due with mortar smoke and some doctrinal options,

Guess which army doesn't have a god damn mortar in their army lineup? Smoke is a seriously important tool that right now the only way the brits can reliably call is via a static emplacement or waiting until they have tanks.
30 May 2019, 14:21 PM
#50
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Rifles are also a close range squad with very high near DPS, which Tommies are not.

And the reason we have to scrape aroind for ideas of how to make this work is because of this:
Vanilla factions more than make due with mortar smoke and some doctrinal options,

Guess which army doesn't have a god damn mortar in their army lineup? Smoke is a seriously important tool that right now the only way the brits can reliably call is via a static emplacement or waiting until they have tanks.


EXACTLY! rifles were designed around having smoke! Needing to close to be at maximum effectiveness and it was still too strong to have a single unit able to do everything. It will be no different for Tommies who are just as frequently blobbed. Players don't want to use the tools they already have, why would they? They want to be able to JUST build their mainline infantry and force of every enemy obstacle.
Mainline infantry should NOT have smoke. I know it's hard to tell from WFA designs but the game is actually supposed to be about combined arms, not just the most powerful mainline. Smoke on Tommies will dumb down ukf play and dissuade any thoughts of combined arms play.
30 May 2019, 15:13 PM
#51
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1



EXACTLY! rifles were designed around having smoke! Needing to close to be at maximum effectiveness and it was still too strong to have a single unit able to do everything. It will be no different for Tommies who are just as frequently blobbed. Players don't want to use the tools they already have, why would they? They want to be able to JUST build their mainline infantry and force of every enemy obstacle.
Mainline infantry should NOT have smoke. I know it's hard to tell from WFA designs but the game is actually supposed to be about combined arms, not just the most powerful mainline. Smoke on Tommies will dumb down ukf play and dissuade any thoughts of combined arms play.


Can't combine arms with smoke if none of your units cheaper than a cromwell have smoke and you don't have a mortar

Not to mention that brens are WORSE at close range.
30 May 2019, 19:07 PM
#52
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

It doesn't have to be on Tommy at all, i said this before but going to repeat, a smoke discharger upgrade on UC is a reasonable solution to me. The upgrade will required platoon cp and locked out wasp while vicker K still can be mounted .
30 May 2019, 19:13 PM
#53
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

It doesn't have to be on Tommy at all, i said this before but going to repeat, a smoke discharger upgrade on UC is a reasonable solution to me. The upgrade will required platoon cp and locked out wasp while vicker K still can be mounted .


It's arguably more powerful on a UC.

If you did put it on a UC though, I wouldn't lock out the WASP. Smoke is what it needs to act as a mid-game garrison clearer. The UC has the range to just kite.
30 May 2019, 19:22 PM
#54
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

Smoke + attack ground will be a bit too powerful then. UC smoke + Tommy pyro will have the same capabilities of Garrison clearing while better represent combined arm gameplay
30 May 2019, 19:30 PM
#55
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

UC's armour going to be neft next patch so add utilities can be the way to go. I think This will help UC remain viable event after the neft and also add a mobile smoke platform to UKF lineup.
30 May 2019, 19:33 PM
#56
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Can't combine arms with smoke if none of your units cheaper than a cromwell have smoke and you don't have a mortar

Not to mention that brens are WORSE at close range.

Except you DO have a mortar. With the highest smoke barrage range of them. It's not mobile, no I'll grant you that, but the pit itself could be tweaked to make up for that shortcoming to deliver smoke. Do everything mainline infantry is a bad design. It didn't work when there was a faction designed specifically with that in mind and it won't work stapled onto a mainline designed to be powerful but specifically to lack utility.
30 May 2019, 19:42 PM
#57
avatar of Support Sapper

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1


Except you DO have a mortar. With the highest smoke barrage range of them. It's not mobile, no I'll grant you that, but the pit itself could be tweaked to make up for that shortcoming to deliver smoke. Do everything mainline infantry is a bad design. It didn't work when there was a faction designed specifically with that in mind and it won't work stapled onto a mainline designed to be powerful but specifically to lack utility.


Indeed, in small map, mortar pit's smoke work well and arguably be the best form of all somke - creeping smoke barrage. But in large map, long range of somke cant make up for the fact that the pit is immobile. A mobile smoke platform is still required.
30 May 2019, 20:21 PM
#58
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1


Smoke on Tommies will dumb down ukf play and dissuade any thoughts of combined arms play.


I don't agree with that, especially since it's not just "smoke on tommies". It's smoke on pyrotechnic tommies, who would have to call it in from howitzers halfway across the map. In what way is that so much better than mortar smoke? If anything it's worse because it's arrival time would be much longer.

This is on a faction that can get AOE healing on their mainlines, which it also relies on for most of its healing. If you want howy smoke on more than one squad that means less healing

I agree a pit rework is the better idea, but i don't think comparing the base howy idea to rifle smoke is an fair comparison
30 May 2019, 23:49 PM
#59
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911

It would make much more sense for smoke flares and barrage to be mutually exclusive upgrades. But this would probably have to be balanced by something as its not like UKF are the worst faction anymore, who can now bolster blob to victory.
30 May 2019, 23:55 PM
#60
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Indeed, in small map, mortar pit's smoke work well and arguably be the best form of all somke - creeping smoke barrage. But in large map, long range of somke cant make up for the fact that the pit is immobile. A mobile smoke platform is still required.


The range is the only issue, which is why I champion the idea of the garrison bonus being increased barrage range. That being HE barrage and smoke. They don't need to rebuild the lineup, just properly adjust what they have.



I don't agree with that, especially since it's not just "smoke on tommies". It's smoke on pyrotechnic tommies, who would have to call it in from howitzers halfway across the map. In what way is that so much better than mortar smoke? If anything it's worse because it's arrival time would be much longer.

This is on a faction that can get AOE healing on their mainlines, which it also relies on for most of its healing. If you want howy smoke on more than one squad that means less healing

I agree a pit rework is the better idea, but i don't think comparing the base howy idea to rifle smoke is an fair comparison

But even now pyrotechnics Tommies can have 5 models at 0.8 unvetted target size, can have AT or double lmgs, increased LOS, build cover and trenches, further increased LOS when in cover, grenades, gammon bombs..... They already do enough without adding a conplicated* smoke option to then as well.

Tommy healing needs toned down to make Pyro more attractive, not making Pyro more powerful. I mean regardless of alternative options 30mu game lone aoe healing on the move is going to be stupid strong. Compare to quite literally any other healing in the game and it stands out as the strongest... That's why it's chosen all the time.

*I say complex because the base howis (while better than previously) are slightly unresponsive. If you could preface the howitzers it might work, but trying to make ample use of them could have them delayed when you need it most.

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

593 users are online: 593 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM