Posts: 392
well by the same logic doesn’t the pak Howy and m8a1 serve the same purpose as the Stuka ? Howy has gigantic barrage range while m8a1 or mayor are for more precise strikes
Posts: 4474
u just compared the kubel to the m20 why can’t I compare Stuka to pak howy or m8a1 ? Is it the double standards ?
No, they are simply totally different kinds of unit that serve totally different purpose. You don't need to hold the line and stay in front of line permanently to maximize your output when using mobile rocket artillery, hence they don't need auto fire mode.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 392
u just compared the kubel to the m20 why can’t I compare Stuka to pak howy or m8a1 ? Is it the double standards ?
Posts: 4474
kubel has no armor no mines the mg is shit etc it’s not like the m20
because kubel and m20 share the same mechanism and serve the same purpose. But stuka and pak and m8a1 doesn't share the same mechanism and serve different purpose in nature. I can have more example, you can't compare bazooka with jackson although they serve the arguable same purpose which is anti vehicle (one is light, one is heavy) but they don't have the same mechanism, therefore you should compare bazooka with panzershreck or PIAT.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 392
kubel has no armor no mines the mg is shit etc it’s not like the m20
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 392
"OKW gets a doctrinal unit so USF needs to have their doctrinal unit turned into a stock unit" Makes sense to me!
Posts: 911
So now you go personal with me and accuse me without providing any reasons or support just because you can't show the relationship between shermen performance and USF should get stock mobile artillery or not. Sounds logical and not rude. Reported.
Posts: 392
May I remind you that you brought up the Sherman in the first case? How hypocritical are you to accuse someone of going off topic, when you brought the off topic topic up in the first place.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
No, it is because OKW getting a stock mobile rocket artillery unit so USF needs to have stock mobile artillery unit. Since you need something to replace the original doctrinal unit in the commander, so it is better to have doctrinal 105 mm howitzer for USF as well since OKW get doctrinal lefh.
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 392
His name is Scott and he lives in T4. You should say hi some time, some people even argue that he's OP because he has a fast shell velocity and in pairs can make short work of infantry and he can even fire constantly unlike the Stuka which has a long recharge and if you get unlucky with spread might not even get any kills.
Posts: 4474
same for kubel and m20 but by ur logic both are the same cause when it fits ur argument u use i, if used as a counter argument it's not ok
Scott is not the same kind of unit as stuka which I have explain to Stug life in details already. Please spend some times to read. The performance of scott is out of the scope of this thread. You can start another thread if you want any change to it.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 206
Posts: 392
same for kubel and m20 but by ur logic both are the same cause when it fits ur argument u use i, if used as a counter argument it's not ok
Posts: 3260
Posts: 1220
Posts: 392
No way do the Kubel and M20 serve the same role. The M20 is a shock unit, minelayer and sniper hunter. The Kubel is a capping vehicle.
Posts: 206
Posts: 4474
again m20 is not luch, luch is a light tank, u are comparing luch to m20 while saying pak m8a1 are not comparable to stuka when they are both long range indirect fire platform
If you are talking about a vehicle for shock purpose, you get luch, which has better performance then M20 and it is a decent sniper hunter also. Note that a unit can have multiple role and each role may have different target to compare.
Katitof-2018
 |
|
|
69 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
295 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
